The Impact of Using A Reciprocal Teaching Strategy on Reading Comprehension By Prospective Teachers

Satriani Satriani 1 Indonesia , Ahmad Munawir 1 Indonesia , Ummul Khair 1 Indonesia , Nur Putriani 1 Indonesia
1 Institut Agama Islam As'adiyah Sengkang, Indonesia
Link Copied!
Published 2022-03-27
Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022) PAGES 169-175
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v1i2.334
Views / Downloads 2503 1254

The goal of this study was to improve students' reading comprehension using a Reciprocal Teaching Strategy in the fourth semester of IAI As'adiyah Sengkang's English education. The researcher used a pre-experimental design that included a pretest and a posttest. The sample comprised of 20 students drawn from IAI As'adiyah Sengkang's fourth semester English education students utilizing a cluster random selection approach. This study used a 20-item multiple-choice reading test as the research tool. Pre-test and post-test data were obtained. The data analysis revealed that the mean score of the students' pre-tests was 59, 29 and the mean score of the post-test was 77,62. It was discovered that pupils' reading comprehension improved after undergoing Reciprocal Teaching treatment (0.05). The researcher concluded that Reciprocal Teaching Strategy was appropriate in teaching reading comprehension at IAI As'adiyah Sengkang's fourth semester of English education. The reciprocal Teaching technique can be used as an alternative strategy in the teaching and learning process by English teachers and other scholars.

Satriani, S., Munawir, A., Khair, U., & Putriani, N. (2022). The Impact of Using A Reciprocal Teaching Strategy on Reading Comprehension By Prospective Teachers. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 1(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i2.334
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Alfassi, M., Weiss, I., & Lifshitz, H. (2009). The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering the reading literacy of students with intellectual disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(3), 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250903016854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250903016854
  2. Arif, A. (2016). Increasing The Students’reading Comprehension By Using Reciprocal Teaching Strategy. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 3(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.31571/bahasa.v3i1.171
  3. Barrett, R. A. (2003). Reciprocal teaching as a Platform for communicative activities in the secondary foreign language classroom: A case study. The University of Akron.
  4. Chang, M. M., & Lan, S. W. (2021). Exploring undergraduate EFL students’ perceptions and experiences of a Moodle-based reciprocal teaching application. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1708298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1708298
  5. Ciampa, K., & Gallagher, T. L. (2018). A comparative examination of Canadian and American pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for literacy instruction. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 457-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9793-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9793-6
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  7. Doolittle, P. E., Hicks, D., Triplett, C. F., Nichols, W. D., & Young, C. A. (2006). Reciprocal teaching for reading comprehension in higher education: A strategy for fostering the deeper understanding of texts. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 106-118.
  8. Goodwin, A. P., Huggins, A. C., Carlo, M. S., August, D., & Calderon, M. (2013). Minding morphology: How morphological awareness relates to reading for English language learners. Reading and Writing, 26(9), 1387-1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9412-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9412-5
  9. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., ... & Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of educational psychology, 96(3), 403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
  10. Hasan, A., Gushendra, R., & Yonantha, F. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on students’ listening and reading comprehension. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 4(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v4i1.4744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v4i1.4744
  11. Hashemi, A. (2021). The effects of using games on teaching vocabulary in reading comprehension: a case of gifted students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 9(2), 181-191. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.846480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.846480
  12. Islam, S. (2020). Implementing reciprocal teaching method in improve the students’reading comprehension ability. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 6(1), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V61.2020.A9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V61.2020.A9
  13. Jegerski, J. (2013). Self-paced reading. In Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 36-65). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203123430-8/self-paced-reading-jill-jegerski DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123430
  14. Li, P., & Clariana, R. B. (2019). Reading comprehension in L1 and L2: An integrative approach. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.03.005
  15. Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2012). The development of reading comprehension skills in children learning English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1873-1898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9309-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9309-8
  16. List, A., Brante, E. W., & Klee, H. L. (2020). A framework of pre-service teachers’ conceptions about digital literacy: Comparing the United States and Sweden. Computers & Education, 148, 103788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103788
  17. Mannong, A. B. M. (2018). The implementation of reciprocal teaching method (RTM) in developing reading comprehension of the second grade students of SMAN 2 Bantaeng. INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 5(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikanbahasa.v5i2.177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikanbahasa.v5i2.177
  18. Maspufah, M. (2019). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension by Using Reciprocal Teaching Strategy. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 6(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2019.vol6(1).2639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2019.vol6(1).2639
  19. Megawati, F. (2016). Kesulitan mahasiswa dalam mencapai pembelajaran bahasa Inggris secara efektif. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal pendidikan, 5(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v5i2.246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v5i2.246
  20. Nation, K., & Norbury, C. F. (2005). Why reading comprehension fails: Insights from developmental disorders. Topics in language disorders, 25(1), 21-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200501000-00004
  21. Oo, T. Z., Magyar, A., & Habók, A. (2021). Effectiveness of the reflection-based reciprocal teaching approach for reading comprehension achievement in upper secondary school in Myanmar. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 675-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09707-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09707-8
  22. Okkinga, M., van Steensel, R., van Gelderen, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. (2018). Effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of low‐achieving adolescents. The importance of specific teacher skills. Journal of research in reading, 41(1), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12082
  23. Paul, A. K., & Karmaker, P. R. (2021). Examining the Role of Reciprocal Teaching in Enhancing Reading Skill at First-Year Undergraduate Level in a Semi-Urban College, Bangladesh. i-Manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 11(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.11.1.17409
  24. Pilonieta, P., & Medina, A. L. (2009). Reciprocal teaching for the primary grades:“We can do it, too!”. The reading teacher, 63(2), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.2.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.2.3
  25. Rastle, K. (2019). The place of morphology in learning to read in English. Cortex, 116, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.008
  26. Reis, A., Araújo, S., Morais, I. S., & Faísca, L. (2020). Reading and reading-related skills in adults with dyslexia from different orthographic systems: a review and meta-analysis. Annals of dyslexia, 70(3), 339-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00205-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00205-x
  27. Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard educational review, 78(1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
  28. Soto, C., Gutiérrez de Blume, A. P., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., & Riffo, B. (2019). Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1565067. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1565067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1565067
  29. Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. L. F. (2009). Improving students' reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and instruction, 19(3), 272-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003
  30. Takala, M. (2006). The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension in mainstream and special (SLI) education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(5), 559-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600953824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600953824
  31. Tarchi, C. (2015). Fostering reading comprehension of expository texts through the activation of readers’ prior knowledge and inference-making skills. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.013
  32. Tseng, S. S., & Yeh, H. C. (2018). Integrating reciprocal teaching in an online environment with an annotation feature to enhance low-achieving students’ English reading comprehension. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(6), 789-802. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1412989 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1412989
  33. Westhisi, S. M. (2019). Metode fonik dalam pembelajaran membaca permulaan bahasa inggris anak usia dini. Tunas Siliwangi: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Guru PAUD STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 5(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.22460/ts.v5i1p29-43.1271
  34. Yawisah, U. (2017). Reciprocal Teaching: One of the methods for poor comprehenders. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 21-25. https://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/index.php/pedagogy/article/view/354

Copyright (c) 2022 ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Reciprocal Teaching Strategy Reading Comprehension