Cooperative Learning Model Think-Pair-Share Type: Learning Independence and Student Self-Consistency at High School Students

Muhammad Arif Sobar 1 Indonesia , A Fatoni 1 Indonesia , Evi Febriani 1 Indonesia
1 Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Link Copied!
Published 2026-04-30
Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026) PAGES 1618-1629
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v5i3.4883
Views / Downloads 154 78

This research is motivated by the low level of student learning independence in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) at High School 13 Bandar Lampung, where the self-consistency indicator only reached 19%. This phenomenon indicates the need for innovative learning models that can foster students' self-confidence and responsibility for learning. This study aims to test the effectiveness of the Think Pair Share (TPS) Cooperative Learning model in improving learning independence, especially in the aspect of student self-consistency. This type of research is a quasi-experiment with a pretest-posttest control group design. The sample was selected using a simple random sampling technique consisting of an experimental class (TPS model) and a control class (conventional method). Data was analyzed using the Independent Samples T-Test after fulfilling the prerequisite tests of Shapiro-Wilk normality (Sig. X = 0.154; Y = 0.173) and Levene's homogeneity (Sig. 0.330). The research findings show that the TPS model has a highly significant partial effect on the dependent variable with a t-value of 57.326 and a significance of 0.000. The mechanism of individual thinking, pair discussions, and sharing results has proven effective in building self-confidence, courage to express opinions, and student responsibility. Theoretically, this study provides novelty in the application of the TPS model in the context of Islamic Religious Education at the high school level, especially in proving that academic procrastination behavior is a reliable predictor of students' levels of self-efficacy and independence. Practically, this study recommends the use of the TPS model to strengthen character and create a participatory classroom atmosphere.

Sobar, M. A., Fatoni, A., & Febriani, E. (2026). Cooperative Learning Model Think-Pair-Share Type: Learning Independence and Student Self-Consistency at High School Students. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 5(3), 1618–1629. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i3.4883
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Afid, A. A., Nuvitalia, D., & Sanjaya, D. (2024). Hubungan Kemandirian Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Ainara Journal (Jurnal Penelitian Dan PKM Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan), 5(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.54371/ainj.v5i2.445
  2. Astriani, N., Bayu, M., & Dhana, A. (2020). Development of Mathematic Teaching Materials Through Think-Pair-Share Learning to Improve Students’ Mathematic Problem Solving Ability. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 54(4), 196-205.
  3. Astuti, A. D., & Rozikin, A. Z. (2024). The role of self-regulated learning in strengthening students' independent learning character: Literature review. English Language in Focus (ELIF), 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.24853/elif.7.1.1-10
  4. Azar, D., Pahrudin, A., Hasanah, I. F., Irawan, R., Fitriani, F., & Susanti, A. (2025). Innovation in Aqidah Akhlak Learning: Implementing Think Pair Share to Cultivate Religious Moderation Values. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 5(1), 476-490. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4270
  5. Chen, B., Zhang, H., & Li, S. (2024). The impact mechanism of negative academic emotions on academic procrastination: The mediating and moderating roles of self-efficacy and goal orientation. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111232
  6. Di Leo, G., & Sardanelli, F. (2020). Statistical significance: p value, 0.05 threshold, and applications to radiomics—reasons for a conservative approach. European radiology experimental, 4(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-0145-y
  7. Febhiyanti, S., Makbuloh, D., & Saputra, M. I. (2026). Flashcard-Based Think-Pair Share Cooperative Learning Model: Interest in Learning Aqidah and Morals. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 5(2), 1161-1174. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i2.4719
  8. Feldon, D. F., Brockbank, R., & Litson, K. (2024). Direct effects of cognitive load on self-efficacy during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(7), 1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000826
  9. Handayani, R., Surya, E. P. A., & Syahti, M. N. (2024). Kemandirian anak dalam memasuki usia sekolah dasar: Pentingnya pembentukan karakter sejak dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Konseling, 2(2), 352-356.
  10. Hasanah, A. N., Baharudin, B., & Hasnanto, A. T. (2025). Think of Pair Share Learning Model on Student Learning Activity in Science Subjects at State Elementary Madrasah. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 5(1), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4200
  11. Herawati, S., Hakim, A., Munir, M., Nahayati, N., & Marhamah, M. (2024). Kontribusi Pola Asuh Orang Tua dan Kemandirian Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 9(2), 210-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v9i2.22154
  12. Hirschauer, N., Grüner, S., & Mußhoff, O. (2022). Fundamentals of statistical inference. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99091-6
  13. Johnston, T. M., Brezina, T., & Crank, B. R. (2019). Agency, self-efficacy, and desistance from crime: An application of social cognitive theory. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 5(1), 60-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-018-0101-1
  14. Karmila, N., & Raudhoh, S. (2021). Pengaruh efikasi diri terhadap kemandirian belajar siswa. Pedagonal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(1), 36-39. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/pedagonal/article/view/2692
  15. Kitanidis, P. K. (2023). Best Linear Unbiased Estimation. In Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences (pp. 79-85). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85040-1_51
  16. Komara, B., & Sukandar, A. (2025). Implementation of Differentiated Learning in Islamic Religious Education in the Independent Curriculum: An Inclusive Approach. At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 701-710. https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v7i1.1074
  17. Manohari, L., & Purwati, R. (2023). Implementation of the Discovery Learning Model Based on Think Pair Share To Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i1.2686
  18. Masitoh, S., & Herman, T. (2024). Kemandirian belajar siswa kelas VII berdasarkan analisis pedagogik pembelajaran matematika. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 7(2), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v7i2.21643
  19. Miti, Listiani, A. A. (2025). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share (Tps) Dan Jigsaw Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Borneo Journal of Biology Education, 7(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.35334/x6q9jy70
  20. Montero, J. A. (2026). A Structured Guide to Univariate Test Selection Based on Normality, Variance Homogeneity, and Graphical Data Exploration. Journal of Surgical Research, 318, 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.10.053
  21. Nisatulloh, R. A., Susiani, T. S., & Chamdani, M. (2024). Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar dan Partisipasi Orang Tua terhadap Hasil Belajar IPAS Siswa Kelas IV SDN Se-Gugus Wonoboyo Tahun Ajaran 2023/2024. Ilmiah Kependidikan, 13(2), 918–931. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkc.v13i2.91152
  22. Nuritha, C., & Tsurayya, A. (2021). Pengembangan Video Pembelajaran Berbantuan Geogebra untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.430
  23. Ozyilmaz, A., Erdogan, B., & Karaeminogullari, A. (2018). Trust in organization as a moderator of the relationship between self‐efficacy and workplace outcomes: A social cognitive theory‐based examination. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(1), 181-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12189
  24. Pasandaran, S., Pangalila, T., & Mania, T. J. (2023). The Influence of Think Pair Share (TPS) Cooperative Learning Model on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Civics Learning in XI MIPA Class at SMA Negeri 1 Amurang. In Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022) (pp. 1739-1746). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0_206
  25. Pogrow, S. (2019). How effect size (practical significance) misleads clinical practice: The case for switching to practical benefit to assess applied research findings. The American Statistician, 73(sup1), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1549101
  26. Portnoy, S. (2022). Linearity of unbiased linear model estimators. The American Statistician, 76(4), 372-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2022.2076743
  27. Rad, H. F., Bordbar, S., Bahmaei, J., Vejdani, M., & Yusefi, A. R. (2025). Predicting academic procrastination of students based on academic self-efficacy and emotional regulation difficulties. Scientific reports, 15(1), 3003. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87664-7
  28. Raehani, S., Triono, M., & Pamungkas, D. (2025). Analisis Kemandirian Belajar Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakan Model TPS (Think Pair Share). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika (JIPM), 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.37729/jipm.v7i1.5807
  29. Rahmadani, U., Nasution, H., & Mariani, M. (2023). The Development of Think Pair Share-Based Learning Tools to Improve Mathematical Metacognition and Communication Abilities. Jurnal Analisa, 9(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v9i2.30070
  30. Salim, A. N., & Disman, D. (2023). The Implementation of the TPS (Think-Pair-Share) Learning Model To Improve Students Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Lingua Idea, 14(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jli.2023.14.1.8318
  31. Sari, C. I., Fitriyah, C. Z., & Puspitaningrum, D. A. (2025). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Type Think Pair Share on Social Attitudes of Elementary School Students. Jurnal Reviu Pendidikan Dasar: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Hasil Penelitian, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v11n1.p1-11
  32. Selvita. (2023). Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 5(1), 416–423. https://doi.org/10.55338/saintek.v5i1.1401
  33. Setianawati, L., Naqiyah, N., Nursalim, M., Surabaya, N., Lidah Wetan, J., Wetan, L., Lakarsantri, K., Surabaya, K., & Timur, J. (2025). CONS-IEDU: Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Analisis Transformasi Kemandirian Belajar melalui Media Digital Interaktif. 05(01), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.51192/cons.v5i1.1955
  34. Susanto, D., Untari, E., & Astuti, I. P. (2021). Efektivitas Think Pair Share (TPS) dan Pembelajaran Langsung dengan Talking Stick (TS) ditinjau dari Prestasi dan Kemandirian Belajar. DIKSI: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Sosial, 2(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.53299/diksi.v2i2.116
  35. Utami, W. C., & Rusdarti, R. (2021). Effectiveness of think-pair-share learning model on students' creativity and critical thinking ability. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 10(2), 268-284. https://doi.org/10.15294/eeaj.v10i2.46502
  36. Viertl, R. (2025). Statistical methods for non-precise data. In International encyclopedia of statistical science (pp. 2511-2514). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-69359-9_615
  37. Yakub. (2024). Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas XI IPS SMAN 2 Mandau. Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia, 3(2), 1001–1006.
  38. Wahyuni, A. (2022). Pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif dengan tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) terhadap kemandirian belajar matematika mahasiswa. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4, 277–286. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v4i0.269
  39. Waruwu, E. W., & Waruwu, E. (2023). Peran Pendidikan Agama Kristen Dalam Meningkatkan Kemandirian Peserta Didik Di Era Kurikulum Merdeka. Sinar Kasih: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Dan Filsafat, 1(2), 98-112. https://jurnal.sttarastamarngabang.ac.id/index.php/sinarkasih/article/view/120
  40. Wuryandani, W. (2021). The Effect of the Think-Pair-Share Model on Learning Outcomes of Civics in Elementary School Students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 627-640. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i2.5640
  41. Yesnik, M. A. P., & Trisnawati, N. (2024). Pengaruh Fasilitas Belajar, Kemandirian Belajar, dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMK. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(4), 3081–3091. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i4.7225

Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Arif Sobar, A Fatoni, Evi Febriani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
High School Islamic Religious Education Learning Independence Self-Efficacy Think Pair Share