From Graduation to Professional Practice: EFL Students’ Self-Reported Collaboration Competence in Indonesian Higher Education

https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v6i1.4900

Authors

Keywords:

Collaborative Learning, EFL, Learning Innovation, Indonesian Higher Education, University Graduates

Abstract

Collaboration competence has become an essential attribute in higher education, particularly in preparing graduates for increasingly complex and team-oriented professional environments. However, the extent to which collaborative learning in university settings aligns with workplace demands remains insufficiently understood, especially in the context within English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in Indonesia. This study aims to examine how collaboration competence is perceived at the point of graduation and how it is subsequently experienced in professional contexts among Indonesian EFL graduates. Adopting a mixed-method design, the study combines quantitative data from a tracer study questionnaire involving 295 alumni (graduates of 2023–2025) and qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with three participants representing each cohort. Quantitative findings reveal a consistent shift in perception, with collaboration competence rated predominantly as “high” at graduation and “very high” in workplace contexts. Qualitative findings further indicate that collaboration competence develops over time, moving from passive participation toward more active, agentic, and sometimes leadership-oriented engagement. The study also identifies key challenges, including unequal participation and communication difficulties, as well as the importance of structure, accountability, and technology-mediated collaboration. Overall, the findings suggest that collaboration competence is not a fixed outcome of higher education but a context-dependent and evolving practice shaped by workplace experiences. This study contributes to the need for higher education to design more structured and authentic collaborative learning environments that better reflect workplace realities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anchunda, H. Y., & Kaewurai, W. (2025). An instructional model development based on inquiry-based and problem-based approaches to enhance prospective teachers’ teamwork and collaborative problem-solving competence. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101480

Andrews-Todd, J., & Forsyth, C. M. (2020). Exploring social and cognitive dimensions of collaborative problem solving in an open online simulation-based task. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 105759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.025

Artunc, E. K., & Hart, D. O. (2020). Interactional competence in paired speaking tests: A study on proficiency-based pairings. System, 89, 102194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102194

Baškarada, S., & Koronios, A. (2018). A philosophical discussion of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research in social science. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-17-00042

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.

Ceballos, H., van den Bogaart, T., van Ginkel, S., Spandaw, J., & Drijvers, P. (2025). How collaborative problem solving promotes higher-order thinking skills: A systematic review of design features and processes. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102001

Crampsey, E. W., Rodriguez, K., Konrad, S. C., DeCarvalho, S., Pelletier, K., Jaeger, C., Rogers, D., & Hall, K. (2023). The impact of immersive interprofessional learning on workplace practice. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 31, 100607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100607

Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455–472). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012174698-8/50045-X

Fayard, K., & Mayer, C.-H. (2023). Male graduates transitioning into the workplace: managing stress through the sense of coherence components. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1053173. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1053173

Fitriana, S., Hendrilia, Y., Judijanto, L., Sulaeman, S., & Anwar, R. N. (2025). Transformation of Higher Education Policy: A Literature Study on the Shift from Kampus Merdeka to Diktisaintek Berdampak. Tofedu: The Future of Education Journal, 4(5), 1278–1284. https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v4i5.554

Gao, X. A. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context (Vol. 49). Multilingual Matters.

Haataja, E., Dindar, M., Malmberg, J., & Järvelä, S. (2022). Individuals in a group: Metacognitive and regulatory predictors of learning achievement in collaborative learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 96, 102146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102146

Hajihasankhansary, L., & Gilanlioglu, I. (2025). Critical Thinking as a Key to Empowering Graduate Students’ English Learning in the AI Era. SAGE Open, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251399104

Hırçın-Çoban, M., & Çimenli, B. (2023). Collaborative turn construction in paired speaking tests across different proficiency levels. Classroom Discourse, 14(4), 366–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2022.2090397

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

Kitjaroonchai, N., & Loo, D. B. (2023). Who are active and inactive participants in online collaborative writing? Considerations from an EFL setting. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(10), 2565–2576. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.15

Larsen-Freeman, D., Driver, P., Gao, X., & Mercer, S. (2021). Learner agency: Maximizing learner potential. URL: Www. Oup. Cpm/Elt/Expert.

Maxwell, G. S. (2023). Assessment and accountability global trends and future directions in 21st century competencies.

Mercer, S. (2012). The Complexity of Learner Agency. http://apples.jyu.fi

Mustofa, R. H., Kuncoro, T. G., Atmono, D., Hermawan, H. D., & Sukirman. (2025). Extending the technology acceptance model: The role of subjective norms, ethics, and trust in AI tool adoption among students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100379

Nakata, A., Vuopala, E., & Weinberger, A. (2025). Conflict experiences and management strategies in intercultural collaborative learning. Research in Comparative and International Education, 20(2), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999251329258

Normawati, A., Susanto, A. I. F., Febrianto, A. R., & Farikah, F. (2023). EFL students’ attitude toward learning English by using collaborative learning. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 5(2), 262–272. DOI: 10.30650/ajte.vxix.xxxx

Qu, X., & Cross, B. (2024). UDL for inclusive higher education—What makes group work effective for diverse international students in UK? International Journal of Educational Research, 123, 102277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102277

Saccardi, I., & Masthoff, J. (2025). Adapting emotional support in teams: productivity, emotional stability, and conscientiousness. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1449176. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1449176

Timans, R., Wouters, P., & Heilbron, J. (2019). Mixed methods research: what it is and what it could be. Theory and Society, 48(2), 193–216.

Wagino, W., Maksum, H., Purwanto, W., Krismadinata, K., Suhendar, S., & Koto, R. D. (2023). Exploring the Full Potential of Collaborative Learning and E-Learning Environments in Universities: A Systematic Review. Tem Journal, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM123-60

Wei, W., & Cao, Y. (2024). Willing, silent or forced participation? Insights from English for academic purposes classrooms. RELC Journal, 55(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368822110666

Yadav, M., Mittal, S., Kumar, M., Sahoo, A., & Jayarathne, P. G. S. A. (2025). From textbooks to teamwork: The importance of collaboration skills in workforce preparation. In Revitalizing student skills for workforce preparation (pp. 333–352). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3856-8.ch011

Yu, H., Chen, Y., & bin Ismail, I. M. (2025). From scaffolding to success: How instructor pedagogical support and collaborative classroom interaction drive scholastic motivation in programming education. Acta Psychologica, 259, 105289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105289

Yunus, H. (2021). Online learning management system (OLMS) in Indonesian Higher Education: investigating benefits and obstacles. PJEIS: Parahikma Journal of Education and Integrated Sciences, 1(1), 1–8.

Yunus, H., & Latief, M. R. A. (2023). Student-Centred Learning in Higher Education: Exploring Indonesian English Language Lecturers’ Perception. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 6(4), 775–785. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i4.32221

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

Yunus, H., & Wahdana, N. P. (2026). From Graduation to Professional Practice: EFL Students’ Self-Reported Collaboration Competence in Indonesian Higher Education. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 6(1), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v6i1.4900