Faith Fragility among University Students in the Digital Era: Behavioral Dimensions, Associated Factors, and Educational Responses

https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v6i3.5932

Authors

  • Darul Nurjanah Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Riza Hadikusuma Business Administration Departement, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Nur Hasyim Business Administration Departement, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Anwar Mustofa Business Administration Departement, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Faith Fragility, University Students, Digital Era, Islamic Religious Education, Tarbiyah

Abstract

Digital technology has reshaped university students’ academic and social experiences, prompting questions about how students sustain Islamic faith amid competing demands, digital engagement, and changing sources of influence. However, the behavioral dimensions of faith fragility in digital contexts are not yet well understood. This study sought to develop a typology of faith fragility among university students from the perspective of Tawhid Rububiyyah, identify associated factors, and formulate faith-strengthening strategies grounded in Hasan al-Banna’s concept of tarbiyah. The study used a descriptive qualitative approach, involving 62 students at Politeknik Negeri Jakarta. Data were collected through questionnaires and direct observation, while a focus group discussion with three Islamic Religious Education lecturers informed the proposed strategies. Data were analyzed using Spradley’s domain, taxonomic, componential, and cultural-theme analyses. The findings identified four dimensions of faith fragility: ritual practice (15.0%), social behavior (27.5%), self-control (37.5%), and religious identity (20.0%), based on 120 recorded behavioral entries. Academic and digital workload, pressure and fear of missing out (FOMO), exposure to digital content, and dependence on oneself and technology emerged as associated factors. Four complementary strategies were proposed: spiritual cultivation, moral education, self-discipline, and Islamic worldview development. The study contributes an exploratory framework connecting Tawhid Rububiyyah, behavioral manifestations of faith fragility, and tarbiyah-based educational responses. This framework may inform more holistic Islamic Religious Education programs, although its applicability and the effectiveness of the proposed strategies require further empirical validation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212

Aqilah, A., Pratiwi, M. A., & Zuhdi, M. (2024). Analisis Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Sekolah Dasar (Analisis Telaah Kurikulum PAI di SD Negeri Jati Padang 01 Jakarta). Jurnal Mudarrisuna: Media Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.22373/jm.v14i3.23860

Aulia, S., Anwar, S., & Nugraha, R. H. (2024). Muatan profil pelajar Pancasila dalam buku ajar Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti tingkat SMP Kurikulum Merdeka. Ta’dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.32832/tadibuna.v13i6.18009

Barikzai, S., Bharathi S, V., & Perdana, A. (2025). Digital learning initiatives forging inclusive education in post-conflict nations. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2457904

Corsby, C. L. T., & Townsend, R. C. (2025). Participant observation. In Research Methods in Sports Coaching, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003381891-24

Ha, O. K., & Beauregard, E. (2016). Sex offending and low self-control: An extension and test of the general theory of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.07.005

Hashi, A. A. (1435). Between Monotheism and Tawhid: A Comparative Analysis. Revelation and Science, 03(02).

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive development approach to socialization. Handbook of Socialization Theory, (9).

Komalasari, M., & Yakubu, A. B. (2023). Implementation of Student Character Formation Through Islamic Religious Education. At-Tadzkir: Islamic Education Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59373/attadzkir.v2i1.16

Kounsar, A. (2016). The Concept of Tawhid in Islam: An Overview of the Perspectives of Some Prominent Muslim Scholars. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 06(02). https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.62.06

Latif, A., Salim, H., & Santoso, M. A. F. (2026). The Values of Tawhid Their Relevance to Formation of Modern Life Ethics. Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity). https://doi.org/10.23917/iseth.6824

Nasution, D. M. (2025). Systematic Literature Review: The Role of Islamic Religious Education in Character Formation. Al-Murabbi Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.62086/al-murabbi.v3i1.1059

Nur Safira, M., & Wardan, K. (2024). Model Pengembangan Pembelajaran PAI Berbasis Living Values Education (LVE). Rayah Al-Islam, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.37274/rais.v8i4.1222

Paulina, R. (2025). Kompetensi Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.65226/jpp.v2i1.195

Salim, S., & Abdullah, S. F. B. (2015). Tawheed the Milestone of Islam; A Reflection of Some Prominent Muslim Scholars And Its Implications to Educators. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(1).

Sapitri, E. Y., Hamami, T., & Muttakin, K. (2025). Integrating Ecotheology into Islamic Religious Education: A Systematic Literature Review on Students’ Spiritual, Social, and Cognitive Character Development. DAYAH: Journal of Islamic Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.22373/jie.v8i2.34136

Shuriye, A. O. (2014). The role of tawheedic stimulus in the conscience of muslim individuals. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23). https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p1940

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan R and D. In Bandung: Alfabeta (Vol. 3, Number April).

Suzuki, A., Shikata, K., & Shimada, T. (2025). Patterns and predictors of cyber fraud victimization: Testing routine activity theory and general theory of crime in Japan. Journal of Economic Criminology, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100186

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Nurjanah, D., Hadikusuma, R., Hasyim, N., & Mustofa, A. (2026). Faith Fragility among University Students in the Digital Era: Behavioral Dimensions, Associated Factors, and Educational Responses. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 6(3), 1752 – 1764. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v6i3.5932