The Relationship Between Southeast Nigerian Students' Interest in Economics and the Methods Used by Economics Teachers to Teach It

Kalu Chidinma Uda 1 Nigeria , Oleabhiele Eric O 1 Nigeria , Gotip Nehemiah Wokji 2 Nigeria
1 Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike
2 Veritas University Abuja
Link Copied!
Published 2024-03-27
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024) PAGES 70-81
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v3i2.1191
Views / Downloads 282 251

This study evaluated how South East Nigerian students' interest in economics correlated with the teaching methods of economics teachers. Descriptive statistics of the correlational type were used in the research methodology; the sample size for the study was chosen using purposive and proportionate sampling techniques; the mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions; Pearson product-moment correlation and the one-way ANOVA F-test were used to test the hypotheses. The study's conclusions demonstrated a strong correlation between students' academic interest in economics and the methods used by economics teachers to teach the subject. The study made several recommendations. Based on its findings, educational administrators should designate professionally educated economists with a foundation in economic pedagogies to teach economics; delivering teaching effectively will result from this. Teachers of economics should make an effort to motivate students to study and to introduce the subject using any suitable teaching strategies. In addition, educating and retraining economics instructors inefficient teaching methods for the classroom.

Uda, K. C., O, O. E., & Wokji, G. N. (2024). The Relationship Between Southeast Nigerian Students’ Interest in Economics and the Methods Used by Economics Teachers to Teach It. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 3(2), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v3i2.1191
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Allais, S. (2012). ‘Economics imperialism’, education policy and educational theory. Journal of Education Policy, 27(2), 253-274.
  2. Amorim Neto, R. D. C., Golz, N., Polega, M., & Stewart, D. (2022). The impact of curiosity on teacher–student relationships. Journal of education, 202(1), 15-25.
  3. Ayeni, A., & Afolabi, E. (2012). Teachers’ instructional task performance and quality assurance of students’ learning outcomes in Nigerian secondary schools. International journal of research studies in educational technology, 1(1), 33-42.
  4. Al-Said, K. (2023). Influence of teacher on student motivation: Opportunities to increase motivational factors during mobile learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 13439-13457.
  5. Becker, S., & Jacobsen, M. (2020). Becoming a maker teacher: Designing making curricula that promotes pedagogical change. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 5, p. 83). Frontiers Media SA.
  6. Berry, A., Depaepe, F., & Van Driel, J. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education. International Handbook of Teacher Education: Volume 1, 347-386.
  7. Brophy, J. (2008). Developing students' appreciation for what is taught in school. Educational psychologist, 43(3), 132-141.
  8. Daly, H. E., & Farley, J. (2011). Ecological economics: principles and applications. Island press.
  9. Ehrenberg, R., Smith, R., & Hallock, K. (2021). Modern labor economics: Theory and public policy. Routledge.
  10. Falk, A. (2012). Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Science education, 96(2), 265-290.
  11. Filgona, J., Sakiyo, J., Gwany, D. M., & Okoronka, A. U. (2020). Motivation in learning. Asian Journal of Education and social studies, 10(4), 16-37.
  12. Gotip, N. W., Ede, M. O., & Oleabhiele, E. O. (2020). Vision and Mission of Economics Education in the 21st Century. Journal Of Economics and Environmental Education, 4(1), 79-87.
  13. Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2007). The role of education quality for economic growth. World Bank policy research working paper, (4122).
  14. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2012). Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. Journal of economic growth, 17, 267-321.
  15. John, P. D. (2006). Lesson planning and the student teacher: re‐thinking the dominant model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 483-498.
  16. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 101-111.
  17. Kruger, D. (2018). Teacher educators' perspectives on Pedagogical Content Knowledge for secondary school Economics teaching (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University).
  18. Manzi, W., & Moreeng, B. (2023). Challenges Facing Implementation of Economics Curriculum: The Experiences of Francis Baard District Teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 1-13.
  19. McWhirter, N., & Shealy, T. (2020). Case-based flipped classroom approach to teach sustainable infrastructure and decision-making. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 16(1), 3-23.
  20. Mussel, P. (2022). Processes underlying the relation between cognitive ability and curiosity with academic performance: A mediation analysis for epistemic behavior in a five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Intelligence, 10(2), 23.
  21. Opara, M. F. (2002). Can self regulation process promote sustainable development through enhancement of science interest in qualitative chemical analysis. The Reading Teacher, 55(1), 250-252.
  22. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 123-138.
  23. Roschelle, J., Bakia, M., Toyama, Y., & Patton, C. (2011). Eight issues for learning scientists about education and the economy. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(1), 3-49.
  24. Rusznyak, L., & Walton, E. (2011). Lesson planning guidelines for student teachers: A scaffold for the development of pedagogical content knowledge. Education as change, 15(2), 271-285.
  25. Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. Handbook of research on learning and instruction, 358-374.
  26. Tietenberg, T., & Lewis, L. (2018). Environmental and natural resource economics. Routledge.
  27. Wyk, M. M. V. (2011). The use of cartoons as a teaching tool to enhance student learning in economics education. Journal of Social Sciences, 26(2), 117-130.
  28. Zulaikha, Z. F., Hariri, H., Rini, R., & Sowiyah, S. (2021). Analysis of vocational education curriculum in ASEAN Economic Community: a literature review. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 1(3), 157-170.

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Economics Interest Method Relationship Teach