REACT Contextual Approach: Effective Numeracy Teaching for Future Mathematics Teachers

Shinta Wulandari 1 Indonesia , Arief Ertha Kusuma 1 Indonesia , Ridwan Ridwan 1 Indonesia , Suciati Suciati 1 Indonesia , Rusmansyah Rusmansyah 2 Indonesia
1 Universitas Borneo Tarakan
2 Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
Link Copied!
Published 2024-06-27
Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024) PAGES 37-49
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v3i3.1727
Views / Downloads 444 496

This study describes adequate numeracy learning in schools for future mathematics teachers in North Kalimantan. It involved 30 students as respondents who observed numeracy teaching carried out by local facilitator teachers in Bunyu district, North Kalimantan. The researcher utilized the REACT contextual approach to offer practical experience in school numeracy teaching. The respondents, assuming the role of students receiving numeracy instruction, observed the teaching process, filled out questionnaires, and provided feedback on the activities through interviews. We used mode score analysis and synthesis of interview results to analyze the student response data descriptively and quantitatively. The results showed that students who attended lectures with the REACT contextual approach strategy responded positively with a response mode score of 4, which is in the excellent category. The interview results showed a clear positive response from most students after participating in the activity. The students expressed that the lecturer's new strategy helped them acquire knowledge and achieve lecture objectives. Therefore, the application of the REACT contextual approach in innovative learning model lectures on effective numeracy teaching for future mathematics teachers in North Kalimantan has proven highly effective.

Wulandari, S., Kusuma, A. E. ., Ridwan, R., Suciati, S., & Rusmansyah, R. (2024). REACT Contextual Approach: Effective Numeracy Teaching for Future Mathematics Teachers. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 3(3), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v3i3.1727
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abrahamson, D., Nathan, M. J., Williams-Pierce, C., Walkington, C., Ottmar, E. R., Soto, H., & Alibali, M. W. (2020). The future of embodied design for mathematics teaching and learning. Frontiers in Education (Vol. 5, p. 147). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00147
  2. Adelia, V., Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi, Z. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review: How Do We Support Students To Become Numerate? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(3), 1816. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26849
  3. Afni, N., & Hartono. (2020). Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) As A Strategy To Improve Students Mathematical Literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012043
  4. Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri, D. (2017). Project- Based Learning and Problem-Based Learning: Are They Effective to Improve Student’s Thinking Skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100
  5. Arends., R. I. (2012). Learning To Teach, Ninth Edition (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  6. Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3. Bumi Aksara.
  7. Asmara, S. D., & Herwin, H. (2023). Profil Numerasi Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 1841. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i2.7274
  8. Baharuddin, M. R., Sukmawati, & Christy. (2021). Deskripsi Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Operasi Pecahan. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v6i2.1607
  9. Basri, H., Kurnadi, B., Tafriliyanto, C. F., Bayu, P., Madura, U., & Kotabumi, U. M. (2021). Investigasi Kemampuan Numerasi. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4, 72–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v4i2.1318
  10. Bieg, M., Goetz, T., Sticca, F., Brunner, E., Becker, E., Morger, V., & Hubbard, K. (2017). Teaching methods and their impact on students’ emotions in mathematics: An experience-sampling approach. ZDM, 49, 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0840-1
  11. Bobis, J., Russo, J., Downton, A., Feng, M., Livy, S., McCormick, M., & Sullivan, P. (2021). Instructional moves that increase chances of engaging all students in learning mathematics. Mathematics, 9(6), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060582
  12. Bolstad, O. H. (2023). Lower Secondary Students’ Encounters With Mathematical Literacy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(1), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00386-7
  13. Btemirova, R. I., Lazarova, L. B., Kairova, F. A., Sopoeva, I. A., & Doev, I. G. (2020). Project-Based Method In The Organization of Educational Activities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1691(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012191
  14. Crawford, M. L. (2001). Teaching Contextually. http://eslmisd.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/67547032/Teaching Contextually to motivate students.pdf
  15. Dalby, D. (2021). Changing Images of Mathematics In The Transition From School To Vocational Education. Adults Learning Mathematics International Journal, 15(1), 45–57. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1332771.pdf
  16. Dantes, N., & Handayani, N. N. L. (2021). Peningkatan Literasi Sekolah Dan Literasi Numerasi Melalui Model Blanded Learning Pada Siswa Kelas V SD Kota Singaraja. WIDYALAYA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(3), 269–283. http://jurnal.ekadanta.org/index.php/Widyalaya/article/view/121
  17. Demir, F., & Altun, M. (2018). Development of Mathematical Literacy Question Writing Process And Skills. Education and Science, 43(194), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7111
  18. Dewi, M. W. K., & Nuraeni, R. (2022). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP ditinjau dari Self-Efficacy pada Materi Perbandingan di Desa Karangpawitan. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v2i1.1586
  19. Djam’an, N., Bernard, & Sahid. (2021). Developing Students’ Creativity in Building City Mathematics through Project Based Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012147
  20. Erlyana, R. (2023). Deskripsi Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa Sd. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 7(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v7i2.4366
  21. Ermiana, I., Umar, U., Khair, B. N., Fauzi, A., & Sari, M. P. (2021). Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa SD Inklusif Dalam Memecahkan Soal Cerita. COLLASE (Creative of Learning Students Elementary Education), 4(6), 895–905. https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/collase/article/view/9101
  22. Fiad, U., Suharto, & Kurniati, D. (2017). Identifikasi Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri 12 Jember Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Konten Space and Shape Uluf Fiad 1 , Suharto 2 , Dian Kurniati 3. Kadikma : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19184/kdma.v8i1.5256
  23. Forgasz, H., Leder, G., & Hall, J. (2017). Numeracy Across the Curriculum in Australian Schools: Teacher Education Students’ and Practicing Teachers’ Views and Understandings of Numeracy. Numeracy, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.10.2.2
  24. Gal, I. (2024). Adult Education In Mathematics And Numeracy: A Scoping Review of Recent Research. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01549-z
  25. Geiger, V., & Schmid, M. (2024). A Critical Turn In Numeracy Education And Practice. Frontiers in Education, 9(2011). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1363566
  26. Hafizi, M. H. M., & Kamarudin, N. (2020). Creativity in Mathematics: Malaysian Perspective. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3C), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081609
  27. Han, W., Susanto, D., Dewayani, S., Pandora, P., Hanifah, N., Miftahussururi, Nento, M. N., & Akbari, Q. S., & K. (2017). M. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Numerasi. In Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Tim GLN Kemendikbud. (Vol. 8, Issue 9).
  28. Hasbi, M., & Fitri. (2023). Pre-Service Teachers with Courses in Problem-Based Learning in Mathematics. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 2(2), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v2i2.588
  29. Hasbi, M., Lukito, A., & Sulaiman, R. (2019). Mathematical connection middle-school students 8th in realistic mathematics education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1417, No. 1, p. 012047). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012047
  30. Klorina, M. J., & Juandi, D. (2022). Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Self-Efficacy: Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 7(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v7i2.6435
  31. Kuat, T., Santosa, B., Yudiana, I. K., & Shah, A. (2022). The Development of Project Based Learning Model Based on Local Wisdom. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 7(10), 475–484. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i10.16069
  32. Kusuma, A. E., Wasis, Susantini, E., & Rusmansyah. (2020). Physics Innovative learning: RODE Learning Model To Train Student Communication Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1), 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012016
  33. Kusuma, A. E., Wasis, W., Susantini, E., & Rusmansyah, R. (2022). Practicality of the RODE Learning Model in Order to Improve Student Communication Skills. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(5), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i5.254
  34. Lopez-Pedersen, A., Mononen, R., Aunio, P., Scherer, R., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2023). Improving Numeracy Skills in First Graders with Low Performance in Early Numeracy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Remedial and Special Education, 44(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221102537
  35. Maghfiroh, F. L., Amin, S. M., Ibrahim, M., & Hartatik, S. (2021). Keefektifan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3342–3351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1341
  36. Mahmud, M. S., & Drus, N. F. M. (2023). The use of oral questioning to improve students’ reasoning skills in primary school mathematics learning. Frontiers in Education, 8(May), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1126816
  37. Marret, C. B., Bauer, P. J., Beall, C., Beier, M., Daniel, D. B., Goldstone, R. L., Graesser, A. C., Immordino-Yang, M. H., Kanfer, R., Karpicke, J. D., Means, B. M., Medin, D. L., Nathan, L., Palincsar, A. S., Schwartz, D. L., & Serpell, Z. N. (2018). How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, And Cultures. In The National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783
  38. Maryani, N., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2020). Mathematical Literacy: How To Improve It Using Contextual Teaching And Learning Method? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581(1), 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012044
  39. Maulidina, A. P., & Hartatik, S. (2019). Profil Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar Berkemampuan Tinggi Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar (JBPD), 3(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21067/jbpd.v3i2.3408
  40. Moreno, R. (2010). Educational Psychology. In John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Vol. 53, Issue 9). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  41. Mufidah, A., Safruddin, & Turmuzi, M. (2022). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas IV SDN 1 Tepas Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendas: Primary Education Journal, 3(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.29303/pendas.v3i1.398
  42. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Vol. I. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
  43. Purwasih, R., Sari, N. R., & Agustina, S. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Dan Mathematical Habits Of Mind Siswa SMP Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Seminar Nasional Ilmu Komputasi Dan Teknik Informatika, 5(1), 154–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v5i1.318
  44. Rini, D. S., Adisyahputra, & Sigit, D. V. (2020). Boosting student critical thinking ability through project based learning, motivation and visual, auditory, kinesthetic learning style: A study on Ecosystem Topic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4A), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081806
  45. Saimon, M., Lavicza, Z., & Dana-Picard, T. (2023). Enhancing the 4Cs Among College Students of A Communication Skills Course In Tanzania Through A Project-Based Learning Model. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6269–6285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11406-9
  46. Salvia, N. Z., Sabrina, F. P., & Maula, I. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Peserta Didik Ditinjau Dari Kecemasan Matematika. ProSANDIKA UNIKAL (Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Pekalongan), 3(1), 351–360. https://www.proceeding.unikal.ac.id/index.php/sandika/article/view/890
  47. Santia, I., & Handayani, A. D. (2023). Exploring Students’ Numerical Literacy on Statistical Problem-Solving in Indonesia. Qubahan Academic Journal, 3(4), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.58429/qaj.v3n4a181
  48. Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2017). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Theoretical considerations and empirical contributions. ZDM, 49, 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0864-6
  49. Sihombing, D. C., & Susilowaty, N. (2023). Meta Analisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Kemampuan Matematis Siswa. JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 9(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.29100/jp2m.v9i1.4028
  50. Siskawati, F. S., Chandra, F. E., & Irawati, T. N. (2021). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi di Masa Pandemi Cov-19. KoPeN: Konferensi Pendidikan Nasional, 3(1), 253–261. http://ejurnal.mercubuana-yogya.ac.id/index.php/Prosiding_KoPeN/article/view/1673
  51. Suciati, Munadi, S., Sugiman, & Febriyanti, W. D. R. (2020). Design and Validation of Mathematical Literacy Instruments for Assessment for Learning in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.865 Introduction
  52. Susanti, U., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2020). Keefektifan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching Learning Dan Problem Solving Ditinjau Dari Prestasi Dan Kepercayaan Diri Siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i1.8537
  53. Utami, Y. P., & Maskar, S. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Model Asynchronous Pada Siswa SMKN 9 Bandar Lampung Melalui Google Classroom. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik (JI-MR), 3(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33365/ji-mr.v3i1.1761
  54. Wahyuni, A. S., Redhana, I. W., & Tika, I. N. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek dengan Strategi Berdiferensiasi terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA, 13(1), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v13i1.824
  55. Wahyuni, H. E. (2022). Penerapan Contextual Teaching Learning Dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Optik Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika Siswa Kelas X MM 1 SMKN 1 Gedangan Kabupaten Malang. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kejuruan, 2(4), 347–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51878/vocational.v2i4.1867
  56. Woolfolk, A. (2017). Educational Psychology (13th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Copyright (c) 2024 ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Contextual Approach Future Mathematics Teacher Numeracy Teaching REACT Students Responses