Modified Tug-of-War Training as a Pedagogical Tool for Volleyball Serve Development in Secondary Physical Education

Panji Panji 1 Indonesia , Muh. Adnan Hudain 1 Indonesia , Arimbi Arimbi 1 Indonesia
1 Physical Education and Sport, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
Link Copied!
Published 2026-09-03
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026) PAGES 171-181
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v6i1.4988
Views / Downloads 271 373

The underhand serve is a foundational skill in volleyball, yet secondary school students frequently experience technical difficulties in regulating arm swing, body alignment, and force delivery due to traditional, repetitive drill-based instruction. This study evaluated the efficacy of modified tug-of-war training as an innovative pedagogical tool to enhance volleyball underhand serve proficiency in secondary physical education. Employing a two-cycle action research design, an intervention was conducted with 80 tenth-grade students (M_"age" =15.4 years) at a public secondary school in Indonesia. The intervention integrated a modified tug-of-war activity designed to provide kinesthetically active resistance, facilitating proper body positioning and momentum transfer. Data were gathered through standardized psychomotor performance rubrics, cognitive assessments, and affective engagement observations, with success evaluated against a predetermined mastery threshold (score ≥80). Baseline data revealed a 0% initial mastery rate. Following the intervention, classical mastery increased significantly to 28.75% (M=75.93) in Cycle I and reached 98.75% (M=90.72) in Cycle II, accompanied by notable improvements in cognitive understanding and affective participation. These findings demonstrate that utilizing modified tug-of-war activities as a task-based pedagogical tool effectively bridges the gap between mechanical force application and skill execution. This approach provides physical education teachers with a scalable, game-based alternative to conventional drills for motor skill acquisition in team sports.

Panji, P., Hudain, M. A., & Arimbi, A. (2026). Modified Tug-of-War Training as a Pedagogical Tool for Volleyball Serve Development in Secondary Physical Education . ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 6(1), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v6i1.4988
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Aliriad, H., Adi, S., Manullang, J. G., Endrawan, I. B., & Satria, M. H. (2024). Improvement of motor skills and motivation to learn physical education through the use of traditional games. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 24(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2024.1.04
  2. Astuti, Y., Erianti, E., Lawanis, H., Orhan, B. E., Ikhlas, A., & Govindasamy, K. (2025). Implementing technical training models to enhance basic volleyball skills in students. Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación, (63), 1075-1083. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v63.111
  3. Awaluddin, A., Samsudin, S., Puspitorini, W., Widiastuti, W., & Syahruddin, S. (2025). A Comprehensive Approach to Enhancing Volleyball Skills: The Role of Problem-Based Learning, Constraint-Led Approach, and Motivation. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 25(3), 548-555. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2025.3.10
  4. Barnett, L. M., Webster, E. K., Hulteen, R. M., De Meester, A., Valentini, N. C., Lenoir, M., ... & Rodrigues, L. P. (2022). Through the looking glass: A systematic review of longitudinal evidence, providing new insight for motor competence and health. Sports medicine, 52(4), 875-920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01088-3
  5. Cayero, R., Rocandio, V., Zubillaga, A., Refoyo, I., Calleja-González, J., Castañeda-Babarro, A., & Martínez de Aldama, I. (2021). Analysis of tug of war competition: A narrative complete review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010003
  6. Dong, W., Huang, P., Xiang, C., Wang, X., & Jiao, Y. (2026). Humanistic Qualities in Physical Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Quest, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2026.2695366
  7. Hardinoto, N., Amansyah, A., Pane, B. S., & Destya, M. R. (2026). Sport Pedagogy Approaches for Enhancing Motor Skills and Learning Motivation in Physical Education: A Systematic Literature Review. INSPIREE: Indonesian Sport Innovation Review, 7(02), 180-189. https://doi.org/10.53905/inspiree.v7i02.180
  8. Hodges-Kulinna, P., Wahl-Alexander, Z., Nam, K., & Kinder, C. (2024). Effective instruction and curricular models: What do we know about student learning outcomes in physical education?. Kinesiology Review, 13(2), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2024-0009
  9. Hudain, M. A., HR, M. A., & Sudirman, S. (2026). Improving Underhand Serve Skills in Volleyball Through the Boy-Boyan Game Approach for Fifth-Grade Students. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 5(2), 1102-1112. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i2.4463
  10. Karisman, V. A., & Supriadi, D. (2022). Volleyball passing model through game-based approach. Journal Sport Area, 7(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2022.vol7(1).7708
  11. Kharisma, Y., Ginanjar, A., Wahyuni, T., & Anggraeni, R. (2025). Enhancing lower passing, confidence, and motivation through cooperative learning: the impact of team game tournaments in volleyball learning. Edu Sportivo: Indonesian Journal of Physical Education, 6(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.25299/esijope.2025.vol6(1).18885
  12. Khudolii, M., Ivashchenko, O., & Khudolii, O. (2025). Fundamental Movement Skills Development in Children Aged 5–12: Theory, Evidence, and Pedagogical Models. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 25(6), 1456-1470. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2025.6.16
  13. Kulman, S. (2026). Modeling screen-based tactical interaction in basketball using a dynamical systems approach for coaching practice. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 26(4), 684-693. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2026.04069
  14. Lizandra, J., Valencia-Peris, A., Ferriz, R., & Peiró-Velert, C. (2025). Using participatory action research to enhance physical education interventions for promoting active lifestyles in schools: a study design and protocol. Healthcare (Vol. 13, No. 18, p. 2362). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182362
  15. Moy, B., Renshaw, I., & Gorman, A. D. (2024). Applying the constraints-led approach to facilitate exploratory learning of the volleyball serve. Journal of Sports Sciences, 42(6), 511-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2345415
  16. Nurrahman, T., Aluwis, A., & Prawibowo, M. (2026). Analysis of Underhand Serve Ability in Volleyball Game Among Extra-Curricular Students at Bahrul Ulum Islamic Boarding School, Pasir Utama, Rokan Hulu Regency. Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 19-27. https://doi.org/10.65943/jikor.2026.v1.i2.69
  17. Orth, D., Van Der Kamp, J., & Button, C. (2019). Learning to be adaptive as a distributed process across the coach–athlete system: situating the coach in the constraints-led approach. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 146-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1557132
  18. Park, S. W., Lee, S. B., & Sung, K. J. (2025). Toward sustainable integration of digital technology in physical education: A teacher-centered TAM–TPACK framework for instructional design. Sustainability, 17(23), 10476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310476
  19. Pinder, R. A., & Renshaw, I. (2019). What can coaches and physical education teachers learn from a constraints-led approach in para-sport?. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 190-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1571187
  20. Renshaw, I., Araújo, D., Button, C., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Moy, B. (2016). Why the constraints-led approach is not teaching games for understanding: A clarification. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 459-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1095870
  21. Renshaw, I., & Chow, J. Y. (2019). A constraint-led approach to sport and physical education pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1552676
  22. Robinson, D. B., Harenberg, S., Walters, W., Barrett, J., Cudmore, A., Fahie, K., & Zakaria, T. (2023). Game Changers: A participatory action research project for/with students with disabilities in school sport settings. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5, 1150130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1150130
  23. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2022). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1-7). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_2630-2
  24. Sakhi, R. A. (2026). The Impact of Active Learning Strategy on Learning the Underhand Serve and Receiving Serve in Volleyball for Female Students Rouaa Abdullah Sakhi. Indonesian Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 6(1), 130-140. https://doi.org/10.52188/ijpess.v6i1.1942
  25. Septianto, I., Nasrulloh, A., Nugraha, H., Ali, M., Ramadhani, A. M., Dewantara, J., ... & Ardian, R. (2024). Traditional games for physical fitness: an experimental study on elementary school students. Retos: Nuevas Perspectivas de Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 54, 122. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v54.104177
  26. Silva, A., Ferraz, R., Branquinho, L., Dias, T., Teixeira, J. E., & Marinho, D. A. (2023). Effects of applying a multivariate training program on physical fitness and tactical performance in a team sport taught during physical education classes. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5, 1291342. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1291342
  27. Stolz, S., & Pill, S. (2014). Teaching games and sport for understanding: Exploring and reconsidering its relevance in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20(1), 36-71. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1356336x13496001
  28. Thomas, A., Paul, L., Rasenyalo, S., Jones, B., & Hendricks, S. (2025). Challenge accepted: A systematic scoping review of the applications of the challenge point framework. Journal of Motor Behavior, 57(4), 444-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2508283
  29. Valle-Muñoz, V. M., Mendoza-Muñoz, M., & Villa-González, E. (2025). Physical literacy as a pedagogical model in physical education. Children, 12(8), 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12081008
  30. Wick, K., Leeger-Aschmann, C. S., Monn, N. D., Radtke, T., Ott, L. V., Rebholz, C. E., ... & Kriemler, S. (2017). Interventions to promote fundamental movement skills in childcare and kindergarten: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports medicine, 47(10), 2045-2068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0723-1
  31. Youness, M., Ouhrir, S., & Lotfi, S. (2026). The effects of digital technologies on physical education outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 26(2), 230-250. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2026.2.02

Copyright (c) 2026 Panji Panji, Muh. Adnan Hudain, Arimbi Arimbi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimensions Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Action Research Modified Games Motor Skill Acquisition Pedagogical Tool Physical Education
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC