An Implementation to Determine the KKM of Music Subject at Junior High School

Mutiara Arlisyah Putri Utami 1 Indonesia , Syaiful Syamsuddin 2 Indonesia
1 Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
2 Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup, Indonesia
Link Copied!
Published 2022-09-27
Vol. 1 No. 4 (2022) PAGES 541-549
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v1i4.605
Views / Downloads 335 359

A KKM determination is the initial stage of assessment. However, there are still some issues related to the topic, especially in musical some issues related to the topic, especially in music. Therefore, this research used a discrepancy evaluation model to describe the purpose of (1) the implementation level of KKM determination in music, specifically in terms of intake, complexity and carrying capacity. (2) The teachers’ constraints in determining KKM There were six music and art teachers from a junior high school who were taken as subjects in this research. Those subjects were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews, documentation, and observations. Data analysis used qualitative analysis and descriptive statistics supported by quantitative data. The results showed that the implementation level of KKM determination in terms of technical procedures was categorized as "good" or "in accordance with predetermined criteria standards." The level of implementation in terms of weighting the value of KKM on the aspect of intake and carrying capacity was categorized as "not very good," while in complexity aspects it was categorized as "good." The teachers’ constraints in determining KKM include: a) determining the value of complexity; b) identifying the student's ability; c) determining the value of the intake; and d) weighing the value of KKM.

Utami, M. A. P., & Syamsuddin, S. (2022). An Implementation to Determine the KKM of Music Subject at Junior High School. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 1(4), 541–549. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i4.605
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Astuti, K. S. (2015). Standardidasi Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Seni Musik Pada Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah. In Imaji (Vol. 2, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.21831/imaji.v2i2.6945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/imaji.v2i2.6945
  2. Chew, L. Z., Chang, P. K., & Piaw, C. Y. (2012). A Relationship Between Creativity and Musical Achievement: A survey of music major trainee teachers in a teacher education institution. Malaysian Journal of Music, 1(2), 59–71. https://ojs.upsi.edu.my/index.php/MJM/article/view/572
  3. Daryanto, & Amirono, M. . (2016). Evaluasi & Penilaian Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Gava Media.
  4. Department, N. Y. S. E. (1995). Assesment in The Arts. Albany.
  5. Gruber, D. D. (2008). Measuring Student Learning in Art Education. Art Education, 61(5), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2008.11518995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2008.11518995
  6. Horn, C., Ramos, M., Blumer, I., & Madaus, G. (2000). Cut Scores - Results May Vary. Nbetpp, 1(1), 1–32.
  7. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.
  8. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah, 43–45. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/18051/1/1. Panduan Penilaian SMP - Cetakan Keempat 2017.pdf
  9. Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. In Academia Edu (Vol. 7, Issue 2). Yogyakarta Nuha Medika.
  10. Margareta, M., Katin, Y. E., & Nazar, E. (2012). Hambatan Pelaksanaan Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal Mata Pelajaran Produktif Tata Busana SMKN 1 Lembah Gumanti. Journal of Home Economics and Tourism, 1(1).
  11. Mesrawati. (2016). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru dalam Menetapkan Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal (KKM) Di SD Negeri 081 Rambah. Trabajo Infantil, 53(9), 1689–1699.
  12. Mochere, J. M. (2017). The future of music education in Kenya: implementation of curriculum and instructional teaching strategies. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(6), 171–180.
  13. Muhammad Anas, M. M. P. (Muhammad A. 2014), hlm. 27. (2014). Mengenal Metodologi Pembelajaran. CV Pustaka Hulwa.
  14. Mukti, T. S., Arlisyah, M., Utami, P., Fantika, D., & Puspitasari, F. (2020). Sekolah alam: evaluasi program sekolah dalam menumbuhkan kecerdasan naturalistik dan kinestetik pada pendidikan anak usia dini. Insania : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 25(1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.24090/INSANIA.V25I1.3542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v25i1.3542
  15. Poerwanti, E., AM, I., & Yayuk, E. (2012). Analisis Ketidak Tercapaian Rerata KKM Peserta Didik pada SDM Pagak, SDM 4 Lawang dan MI Nurul Islam Tajinan. Jurnal Humanity, 8(1), 11281.
  16. Samritin, & Suryanto. (2016). Developing an Assessment Instrument of Junior High School Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics. Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(1), 92–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.8268
  17. Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598-642. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870
  18. Sri Mudijah, H. (2009). Pengukuran Dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Seni. Kajian Penelitian Seni, 2, 1–16.
  19. Syamsuddin, S, Setiawati, F. A., & Syamsuddin, S. (2018). The influence of problem solving ability, emotional intelligence and formative tests on learning outcomes of mathematics. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 3, 803–808. http://science.conference.upi.edu/proceeding/index.php/ICMScE/article/view/174
  20. Syamsuddin, Syaiful, & Istiyono, E. (2018). The effectiveness of mathematics learning through contextual teaching and learning approach in Junior High School. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2014(1), 020085. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054489
  21. Syamsuddin, Syaiful, & Utami, M. A. P. (2021). Efektivitas pembelajaran matematika melalui pendekatan contextual teaching and learning. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.51574/JRIP.V1I1.14) DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v1i1.14
  22. Utami, & Syamsuddin. (2020). Preschool jurnal perkembangan dan pendidikan anak usia dini perubahan perilaku nomophobia melalui pendekatan interaksi sosial: single case research (SCR). Preschool: Jurnal Perkembangan Dan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 133–140. http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/preschool/article/view/10307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/preschool.v2i1.10307
  23. Widodo. (2009). Mencapai Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal Menggunakan Bilangan Baku. Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur, 13.
  24. Yendarman. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Menetapkan KKM Dengan Diskusi Kelompok Kecil Bagi Guru. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 16(3), 122–129. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/225351-peningkatan-kemampuan-menetapkan-kkm-den-bdfe1101.pdf
  25. Zieky, M., & Perie, M. (2006). A primer on setting cut scores on tests of educational achievement. ETS Report, 1–26. papers3://publication/uuid/12EE77FA-8EAD-4E4F-8611-181AA31426BF

Similar Articles

<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Junior High School KKM Music Art Evaluation