All about learning methods: Past, Present and Future

Muhammad Hafeez 1 Pakistan , Muhammad Hasbi 2 Indonesia
1 Department of Education, Institute of Southern Punjab, Multan, Pakistan
2 Institut Agama Islam As'adiyah Sengkang, Indonesia
Link Copied!
Published 2023-09-27
Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023) PAGES 14-25
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v2i4.953
Views / Downloads 1043 586

Learning methods play a vital role in instructional pedagogy. Different learning methods are available that are being used according to the learning environment and educational levels. The objectives of this review study were to discuss the different past, current, and future learning methods. The past learning methods consisted of traditional learning methods, discussion learning methods, and module-based learning. The current learning methods consist of flipped learning methods, online learning methods, digital game-based learning methods, blended learning methods, project-based learning methods, inquiry-based learning methods, case-based learning methods, problem-based learning methods, and concept-based learning methods. The future learning methods consisted of artificial intelligence-based learning methods. All these methods have been discussed in this review article.

Hafeez, M., & Hasbi, M. (2023). All about learning methods: Past, Present and Future. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 2(4), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v2i4.953
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Ajmal, F., Batool, M., & Hafeez, M. (2022). Application of Educational Technology in Higher Educational Institutions. UW Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 81-94. https://uwjss.org.pk/index.php/ojs3/article/view/49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56220/UWJSS2022/0501/05
  2. Ajmal, F., Shaheen, A., & Hafeez, M. (2022). Concept Maps Learning Strategy In Higher Educational Perspectives Of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Society, Education & Language, 9(1).
  3. Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2012). Design and Development of Physics Module Based on Learning Style and Appropriate Technology by Employing Isman Instructional Design Model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 84-93.
  4. Bakhsh, K., Hafeez, M., Shahzad, S., Naureen, B., & Faisal Farid, M. (2022). Effectiveness of Digital Game Based Learning Strategy in Higher Educational Perspectives. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 9(4), 258-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i4.4247
  5. Basal, A. (2015). The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching. Turkish online journal of distance education, 16(4), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.72185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.72185
  6. Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937
  7. Basit, I. F. F. A. T., Bakhsh, K. H. U. D. A., & Hafeez, M. (2021). Adult Learning Theories and their Role in Instructional Design, Curriculum Development and Educational Technology. Wseas Transactions on Environment and Development, 17, 1149-1159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2021.17.106
  8. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Before you flip, consider this. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 25-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400206
  9. Erdem, M., & Kibar, P. N. (2014). Students' Opinions on Facebook Supported Blended Learning Environment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(1), 199-206.
  10. Ernst, D. C., Hodge, A., & Yoshinobu, S. (2017). What is inquiry-based learning. Notices of the AMS, 64(6), 570-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1536
  11. Farashahi, M., & Tajeddin, M. (2018). Effectiveness of teaching methods in business education: A comparison study on the learning outcomes of lectures, case studies and simulations. The international journal of Management Education, 16(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.01.003
  12. Hafeez, M. (2021). Using Laptop At University Level A Survey Based Approach. Indonesian Journal of Basic Education, 4(2), 175-182. https://www.stkiprokania.ac.id/e-jurnal/index.php/IJOBE/article/view/395
  13. Hafeez, M. (2021a). Impact of Teacher's Training on Interest and Academic Achievements of Students by Multiple Teaching Methods. Pedagogical Research, 6(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11088
  14. Hafeez, M. (2021b). Teaching-learning process and ict tools-a review. Indonesian Journal of Basic Education, 4(1), 18-27. https://www.e-jurnal.stkiprokania.ac.id/index.php/IJOBE/article/view/371
  15. Hafeez, M. (2021c). Systematic review on modern learning approaches, critical thinking skills and students learning outcomes. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 4(1), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i1.33192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i1.33192
  16. Hafeez, M. (2021d). Effects of Game Based Learning in Comparison of Traditional Learning to Provide Effective Learning Environment-A Comparative Review. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 8(4), 100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v8i4p100
  17. Hafeez, M. (2021e). Project-Based Versus Traditional Lecture Teaching Methods. Social Science Learning Education Journal, 6(07), 513-524.
  18. Hafeez, M. (2021f). Assessment of academic achievements and memorisation power of students by concept map strategy and traditional lecture approach. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 13(3), 133-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v13i3.5922
  19. Hafeez, M., & Akhter, Y. (2021). Effects of Blended Learning in Comparison of Traditional Learning to Provide Safer Learning Environment-A Comparative Review. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 2(6), 1604-1615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v2i6.209
  20. Hafeez, M., Ajmal, F., & Kazmi, Q. A. (2021). Challenges faced by the teachers and students in online learning. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(2), 325-346.
  21. Hafeez, M., Ajmal, F., & Zulfiqar, Z. (2022a). Assessment of Students' Academic Achievements in Online and Face-to-Face Learning in Higher Education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 259-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1326
  22. Hafeez, M., Bidari, S., & Zulfiqar, Z. (2023a). Effects of Blended Learning Approach on English Performance of Students at Primary Level. ISTES BOOKS, 143-174.
  23. Hafeez, M., Ajmal, F., & Zulfiqar, Z. (2023c). Artificial Intelligence in Instructional Pedagogy: Potential Benefits and Future Implications. ISTES BOOKS, 44-64.
  24. Hafeez, M., Durrani, R., Saleem, A., & Tahira, F. (2023a). Effects of blended teaching method on mathematics performance of students at primary level-a case study of district Dera Ghazi Khan, Punjab, Pakistan. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i2.53287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i2.53287
  25. Hafeez, M., Kazmi, Q. A., Tahira, F., Hussain, M. Z., Ahmad, S., Yasmeen, A., ... & Saqi, M. I. (2020). Impact of school enrolment size on student’s achievements. Indonesian Journal of Basic Education, 3(1), 17-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v3i1.170
  26. Hafeez, M., Naureen, S., & Sultan, S. (2022). Quality Indicators and Models for Online Learning Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(4), 374-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.4.2553
  27. Hasbi, M., & Fitri. (2023). Pre-Service Teachers with Courses in Problem-Based Learning in Mathematics. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 2(2), 51-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v2i2.588
  28. Iqbal, S., Niazi, S., & Hafeez, M. (2021). Developments on Technology Integration in Language Teaching and Learning. Global Educational Studies Review, VI, 6, 21-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-III).03
  29. Khalaf, B. K., & Mohammed Zin, Z. B. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545-564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a
  30. Li, O., Liu, H., Chen, C., & Rudin, C. (2018, April). Deep learning for case-based reasoning through prototypes: A neural network that explains its predictions. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 32, No. 1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11771
  31. Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2017). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: instructors’ perspectives. Journal of computing in higher education, 29, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9119-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9119-8
  32. Lu, O. H., Huang, A. Y., Huang, J. C., Lin, A. J., Ogata, H., & Yang, S. J. (2018). Applying learning analytics for the early prediction of Students' academic performance in blended learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 220-232.
  33. McLean, S. F. (2016). Case-based learning and its application in medical and health-care fields: a review of worldwide literature. Journal of medical education and curricular development, 3, JMECD-S20377. https://doi.org/10.4137/JMECD.S20377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4137/JMECD.S20377
  34. Muzaini, M., Rahayuningsih, S., Nasrun, N., & Hasbi, M. (2021). Creativity in synchronous and asynchronous learning during the covid-19 pandemic: a case study. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 1722-1735. http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3897
  35. Muzaini, M., Hasbi, M., Ernawati, E., & Kristiawati, K. (2022). The Empowerment of Problem-Based Learning Models to Improve Students’ Quantitative Reasoning. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 12(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v12i1.8502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v12i1.8502
  36. Nami, F., Marandi, S. S., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2018). Interaction in a discussion list: An exploration of cognitive, social, and teaching presence in teachers’ online collaborations. ReCALL, 30(3), 375-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000349
  37. Nilsson, N. J. (1998). Artificial intelligence: a new synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann.
  38. Omar, A., Weerakkody, V., & Daowd, A. (2020). Studying Transformational Government: A review of the existing methodological approaches and future outlook. Government Information Quarterly, 37(2), 101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101458
  39. Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., ... & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
  40. Qasim, M., Saleem, A., & Hafeez, M. (2021). Parental Involvement in Online Learning and Academic Achievements of their Children under COVID-19 Conditions. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 5(4), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2021(5-IV)01
  41. Ramzan, H., & Hafeez, M. (2021). Enhancing Student’s Writing Ability In Paragraph Writing Through An Outline Strategy At Primary Level. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 299-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i2.37211
  42. Saira, A., Ajmal, F., & Hafeez, M.(2020a). Assessment of Student’s Academic Achievement by Flipped Classroom Model and Traditional Lecture Method. Global Educational Studies Review, 4, 10-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2020(V-IV).02
  43. Saira, A., Ajmal, F., & Hafeez, M. (2021). Critical Review on Flipped Classroom Model Versus Traditional Lecture Method. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(1), 128-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.91.128.140
  44. Saira, N. Z., & Hafeez, M. (2021). A critical review on discussion and traditional teaching methods. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(1), 1871-1886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i1.1042
  45. Schroeder, N. L., Nesbit, J. C., Anguiano, C. J., & Adesope, O. O. (2018). Studying and constructing concept maps: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 431-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9403-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9403-9
  46. Seeley, C. L. (2017). Turning teaching upside down. Educational Leadership, 75(2), 32-36.
  47. Smith, B. C. (2019). The promise of artificial intelligence: reckoning and judgment. Mit Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12385.001.0001
  48. Sun, G., & Bin, S. (2018). Topic Interaction Model Based on Local Community Detection in MOOC Discussion Forums and its Teaching. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(6).
  49. Tomas, L., Evans, N. S., Doyle, T., & Skamp, K. (2019). Are first year students ready for a flipped classroom? A case for a flipped learning continuum. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0135-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0135-4

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 38 39 40 41 42 43 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Learning Methods Past Current Future