Project Based Learning Model Assisted by Mind Mapping Media: Student Creativity in IPAS Lessons at Public Islamic Elementary

1 Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Link Copied!

This study seeks to evaluate the impact of the Project Based Learning (PjBL) model, facilitated by mind mapping media, on enhancing students' creativity in science education. This research employs a quasi-experimental approach utilizing a nonequivalent control group design. This research was carried out in fourth grade at State Elementary Madrasah 2 in Bandar Lampung. Data acquisition via assessments, interviews, and observations. The analysis of data involves quantitative assessment utilizing the independent samples t-test. The study's results demonstrate a substantial and favorable impact of the Project Based Learning (PjBL) model, facilitated by mind mapping media, on students' creativity in science subjects. The findings stem from the independent sample t-test, revealing a significance value of 0.000, which is less than the significance threshold of 0.05. Moreover, the creativity of students engaged in the mind mapping-assisted project-based learning model was quantitatively superior to that of students involved in conventional learning. The substantial disparity in the average posttest scores between the experimental group (mean = 16.82) and the control group (mean = 12.18) is apparent. The efficacy of the Mind Mapping-assisted PjBL model in fostering creativity derives from the synergy between the student-centered learning paradigm and the application of visual cognitive tools. Project-based learning fosters a genuine and demanding educational atmosphere, motivating students to engage in exploration, collaboration, and problem-solving. Mind mapping is an effective tool for promoting non-linear thinking, visually organizing complex ideas, and integrating the brain's logical and creative functions.

Wansyah, R., Fiteriani, I., & Erfayliana, Y. (2025). Project Based Learning Model Assisted by Mind Mapping Media: Student Creativity in IPAS Lessons at Public Islamic Elementary. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 4(4), 1336–1351. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3825

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Andreani, D., & Gunansyah, G. (2023). Persepsi guru Sekolah Dasar tentang Mata Pelajaran IPAS pada kurikulum merdeka. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 11(9). https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-penelitian-pgsd/article/view/54388
  2. Bryce, T. G. K., & Blown, E. J. (2024). Ausubel’s meaningful learning re-visited. Current Psychology, 43(5), 4579-4598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04440-4
  3. Burganova, R., Abdullina, S., & Tuyakova, A. (2018). Improving the quality of education through student-centered education. Series of Social and Human Sciences, 6, 102-104.
  4. Daryanes, F., Darmadi, D., Fikri, K., Sayuti, I., Rusandi, M. A., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2023). The development of articulate storyline interactive learning media based on case methods to train student's problem-solving ability. Heliyon, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15082
  5. Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter?. Higher education, 62(3), 279-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
  6. Gannar, S., & Kilani, C. (2025). Contextualized Learning and Social Constructivism: Implementing a Project-Based Approach in Information Systems Development Education. Journal of Science Learning, 8(1), 15-24.
  7. Goebert, C. (2023). Mind mapping as an innovative tool to enhance project-based learning utilizing technology tools. Sports Innovation Journal, 4(SI), 120-136.
  8. Fangestu, I. W. F., & Syahrizal, H. (2023). Digitalisasi Lembaga Pendidikan dalam Menghadapi Perkembangan dan Kemajuan Teknologi Informasi Dunia Pendidikan. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 1(2), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v1i2.89
  9. Fortuna, K. P. D., & Aeni, K. (2024). The effectiveness of the mind mapping in PjBL on the learning outcomes and the creativity of elementary school students. International Journal of Elementary Education, 8(2), 324-335. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v8i2.78006
  10. Fülöp, M. T., Breaz, T. O., Topor, I. D., Ionescu, C. A., & Dragolea, L. L. (2023). Challenges and perceptions of e-learning for educational sustainability in the “new normality era”. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1104633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104633
  11. Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking skills and Creativity, 26, 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
  12. Hidayati, S., & Restian, A. (2023). Peningkatan kreativitas menggunakan model project based learning mata pelajaran IPAS konteks merdeka belajar kelas 4 sekolah dasar. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 1865-1877.
  13. Jia, J., Ghazali, N. E., Ming, E. S. L., & Addi, M. M. (2025). The Impact of Scaffolding on the Development of Metacognitive Skills in Project-Based Engineering Learning. Asean Journal of Engineering Education, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11113/ajee2025.9n1.177
  14. Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., & Jotsov, V. (2023). A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: a systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8
  15. Kladder, J. R. (2019). Learner-centered teaching. The Learner-Centered Music Classroom: Models and Possibilities, 1.
  16. Kusmanto, A. S., Setyosari, P., Atmok, A., & Hambali, I. M. (2021). Thinking Creativity as an Indicator of Student's Academic Achievement. Ilkogretim Online, 20(1).
  17. Lee, N., & Chen, C. H. (2025). Constructive alignment in studio-based learning: enhancing design education through the zone of proximal development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-025-10021-2
  18. Li, F. Y., Hwang, G. J., Chen, P. Y., & Lin, Y. J. (2021). Effects of a concept mapping-based two-tier test strategy on students’ digital game-based learning performances and behavioral patterns. Computers & Education, 173, 104293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104293
  19. Lubis, L. H., Febriani, B., Yana, R. F., Azhar, A., & Darajat, M. (2023). The use of learning media and its effect on improving the quality of student learning outcomes. International Journal Of Education, Social Studies, And Management (IJESSM), 3(2), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.52121/ijessm.v3i2.148
  20. Makinde, S. O., Ajani, Y. A., & Abdulrahman, M. R. (2024). Smart learning as transformative impact of technology: A paradigm for accomplishing sustainable development goals (SDGs) in education. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(3), 213-224. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJERT/article/view/66097
  21. Maros, M., Korenkova, M., Fila, M., Levicky, M., & Schoberova, M. (2023). Project-based learning and its effectiveness: evidence from Slovakia. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4147-4155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1954036
  22. Marwa, N. W. S., Usman, H., & Qodriani, B. (2023). Persepsi guru sekolah dasar terhadap mata pelajaran IPAS pada kurikulum merdeka. Metodik Didaktik, 18(2), 54-64. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/MetodikDidaktik/article/view/53304
  23. Masruri, M. A., Efendi, A., & Sumaryati, S. (2024). Innovative Project-Based Learning Video Tutorial Media: Development and Its Effect on Students Collaborative Skills. JTP-Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 26(3), 926-943. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v26i3.49648
  24. Purwaningsih, I., Oktariani, O., Hernawati, L., Wardarita, R., & Utami, P. I. (2022). Pendidikan sebagai suatu sistem. Jurnal Visionary: Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dibidang Administrasi Pendidikan, 10(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.33394/vis.v10i1.5113
  25. Sanga, L. D., & Wangdra, Y. (2023). Pendidikan adalah faktor penentu daya saing bangsa. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Sosial Dan Teknologi (SNISTEK) (Vol. 5, pp. 84-90). https://doi.org/10.33884/psnistek.v5i.8067
  26. Selkrig, M., & Keamy, K. (2017). Creative pedagogy: a case for teachers’ creative learning being at the centre. Teaching Education, 28(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2017.1296829
  27. Sexton, S. S. (2025). Meaningful Learning—David P. Ausubel. In Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (pp. 157-171). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81351-1_10
  28. Siregar, T. E., Luali, N., Vinalistyosari, R. C., Hanurawan, F., & Anggraini, A. E. (2024). Implementation of Vygotsky’s Constructivism Learning Theory through Project-Based Learning (PjBL) in Elementary Science Education. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(4), 2586-2607. http://dx.doi.org/10.35931/aq.v18i4.3620
  29. Shavkidinova, D., Suyunova, F., & Kholdarova, J. (2023). Education is an important factor in human and country development. Current research journal of pedagogics, 4(01), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-04-01-04
  30. Sucilestari, R., Ramdani, A., Sukarso, A. A., Susilawati, S., & Rokhmat, J. (2023). Project-Based Learning Supports Students' Creative Thinking in Science Education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 1038-1044. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5054
  31. Suprapmanto, J., & Zakiyah, S. W. (2024). Analisis permasalahan pembelajaran IPAS pada siswa kelas 4 SD. Jurnal BELAINDIKA (Pembelajaran Dan Inovasi Pendidikan), 6(2), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.52005/belaindika.v6i2.232
  32. Tholibon, D. A., Nujid, M. M., Mokhtar, H., Rahim, J. A., Rashid, S. S., Saadon, A., ... & Salam, R. (2022). The factors of students’ involvement on student-centered learning method. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(4), 1637-1646.
  33. Torrijo, F. J., Garzón-Roca, J., Cobos, G., & Eguibar, M. Á. (2021). Combining project based learning and cooperative learning strategies in a geotechnical engineering course. Education Sciences, 11(9), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090467
  34. Wu, T. T., & Chen, A. C. (2018). Combining e-books with mind mapping in a reciprocal teaching strategy for a classical Chinese course. Computers & Education, 116, 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.012
  35. Zakarina, U., Ramadya, A. D., Sudai, R., & Pattipeillohi, A. (2024). Integrasi mata pelajaran IPA dan IPS dalam kurikulum merdeka dalam upaya penguatan literasi sains dan sosial di sekolah dasar. Damhil Education Journal, 4(1), 50-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.37905/dej.v4i1.2487
  36. Zhan, Z., Shen, W., & Lin, W. (2022). Effect of product-based pedagogy on students’ project management skills, learning achievement, creativity, and innovative thinking in a high-school artificial intelligence course. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 849842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849842
  37. Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1202728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles