Learning Cycle 7E Learning Model: Optimizing Student Learning Outcomes in Aqidah Akhlak

Rosa Shafira Ulya 1 Indonesia , Erlina Erlina 1 Indonesia , Sunarto Sunarto 1 Indonesia
1 Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Link Copied!
Published 2026-02-28
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026) PAGES 1072-1090
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v5i2.4685
Views / Downloads 204 157

This research focuses on MA Nurul Iman Sekincau's low student learning results in the evaluative and creative parts of Aqidah Akhlak. Low student participation and traditional learning paradigms may hamper higher-order thinking. This quantitative study tests the 7E Learning Cycle model's impact on student learning, particularly at cognitive levels C5 (evaluating) and C6 (creating), as well as affective and psychomotor domains. The study was quasi-experimental with a post-test-only control group. A was the experimental group that received the 7E Learning Cycle model, while B was the control group that used conventional methods. Multiple-choice cognitive C5 and C6 exams, self-assessment questionnaires, and performance observation sheets were used. The findings of the data analysis demonstrated that the 7E Learning Cycle model considerably improved student learning. Cognitive hypothesis testing revealed a significant difference between experimental and control groups (t-value = 3.581, p < 0.001). Through internalizing character ideals and religious attitudes, this model significantly impacted the affective and psychomotor domains (p = 0.000, mean difference = 3.721), outperforming the control group. The cognitive instrument had critical notes since it was dominated by easy and very easy items (86.66%), so its discriminatory power needed to be increased despite meeting validity and reliability requirements. This study found that the 7E Learning Cycle model can help Madrasah educators improve Aqidah Akhlak learning through active involvement and high-level cognitive stimulation.

Ulya, R. S., Erlina, E., & Sunarto, S. (2026). Learning Cycle 7E Learning Model: Optimizing Student Learning Outcomes in Aqidah Akhlak. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 5(2), 1072–1090. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i2.4685
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Agusdianita, N., Yuliarti, K. R., Mediana, V., Nurhasanah, N., Purnamasari, W., & Bela, M. D. P. (2025). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Team Game Tournament (Tgt) Pada Muatan Pelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila Materi Hak Dan Kewajiban Kelas Iii Sdn 52 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE), 4(1), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.37676/mude.v4i1.7503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37676/mude.v4i1.7503
  2. Ainurrahmi, A., Arianto, F., & Kholidya, C. F. (2024). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle 7E terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa: Systematic Literature Review. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(12), 14009-14014. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i12.6422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i12.6422
  3. Alfaruqi, A. Z., & Nurwahidah, N. (2025). Reflection on indonesia's pisa scores and the 2024 madrasah teacher competency assessment results: challenges in enhancing teacher competence. Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 15(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpi.v15i1.2559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37630/jpi.v15i1.2559
  4. Alqarny, F. U., & Ridha, A. R. (2024). Obyek Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Aspek Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif, 6(1).
  5. Aljallad, M. Z., & Ali Al-dulaimi, M. R. (2018). The Influence of Using the (7Es) Learning Cycle Strategy on Achievement of Eighth Grade Students in Islamic Jurisprudence Unit and Developing their Deductive Thinking Skills. International Journal for Research in Education, 42(1), 64-97. https://scholarworks.uaeu.ac.ae/ijre/vol42/iss1/3/
  6. Al Abri, M. H., Al Aamri, A. Y., & Elhaj, A. M. A. (2024). Enhancing student learning experiences through integrated constructivist pedagogical models. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(1), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(1).11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(1).11
  7. Amini, R., & Lena, M. S. (2019). The effectiveness of integrated learning model to improve the students competence at elementary school. Unnes Science Education Journal, 8(1). https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/usej/article/view/15486
  8. Anjelina, I. P., Amin, A., & Ariani, T. (2023). Pengaruh model learning cycle 7E terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan minat belajar siswa kelas X SMA negeri 4 Lubuklinggau. Journal of Education and Instruction, 6(2), 679-692.
  9. Arianto, R. (2022). Permasalahan dalam Pembelajaran: Survey Kepustakaan. Jurnal Citra Pendidikan, 2(3), 550-554. https://doi.org/10.38048/jcp.v2i3.741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38048/jcp.v2i3.741
  10. Arif, M., Abdurakhmonovich, Y. A., & Dorloh, S. (2023). Character education in the 21st century: The relevance of Abdul Wahhab Ash Syarani’s and Thomas Lickona’s concepts. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Keislaman, 12(1), 35-58. https://doi.org/10.35878/islamicreview.v12i1.690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35878/islamicreview.v12i1.690
  11. Bahri, S., & Adiansha, A. A. (2020). Pengaruh model learning cycle 7e dan kecerdasan interpersonal terhadap pemahaman konsep IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 6(1), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.23960/Jpa.V6n1.20866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jpa.v6n1.20866
  12. Balta, N., & Sarac, H. (2016). The effect of 7E learning cycle on learning in science teaching: A meta-analysis study. European Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.5.2.61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.5.2.61
  13. Bella, K. T. (2024). Hubungan antara Minat Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Siswa SDS Amkur Bengkayang. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN KEGURUAN, 1(12), 3553-3557. https://jutepe-joln.net/index.php/JURPERU/article/view/564
  14. Brewe, E., Etkina, E., & Neumann, K. (2023). Holistic learning environments. The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Teaching Physics, 49. https://doi.org/10.1063/9780735425712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/9780735425712_008
  15. Bulkani, B., Riadin, A., Ni’Mah, N., & Setiawan, M. A. (2025). Impact of holistic learning models on character development: a systematic review. Образование и наука, 27(5), 111-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2025-5-111-141
  16. De Witt, A., Bootsma, M., Dermody, B. J., & Rebel, K. (2024). The seven-step learning journey: A learning cycle supporting design, facilitation, and assessment of transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 22(3), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/15413446231220317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15413446231220317
  17. Esti, I., Hersulastuti, H., Indiyah, P. A., & Kun, A. A. (2023). Portrait of education in Indonesia: Learning from PISA results 2015 to present. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(1), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.1.18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.1.18
  18. Fatimah, Y., Cahyani, Z. K., & Ardiansyah, A. S. (2023). Student’s Mathematics Understanding and Learning Outcomes trough Cooperative Learning Model. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 6, pp. 100-103). https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/prisma/article/view/66499
  19. Ghaedi, B., Gholtash, A., Hashemi, S. A., & Mashinchi, A. A. (2020). The educational model of social constructivism and its impact on academic achievement and critical thinking. Journal of Education Experiences, 3(1), 79-102. https://oiccpress.com/jee/article/view/10943
  20. Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., Molnár, G., Fischer, A., Funke, J., & Csapó, B. (2013). Complex problem solving in educational contexts—Something beyond g: Concept, assessment, measurement invariance, and construct validity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 364. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2013-05301-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031856
  21. Islamy, M. R. F., & Budiyanti, N. (2025). Strategies, Opportunities And Challenges Of Islamic Religious Education In The Modern Era Of Indonesia: Creative Learning Cycle And Ethnoreligion As An Alternative To Transformative Learning. Jurnal Studi Islam, 14(2), 374-396. https://doi.org/10.33477/jsi.v14i2.11884
  22. Istiqomah, I., Syafe’i, I., Irawan, R., & Baharudin, B. (2025). Students’ Learning Motivation: An Experimental Study of the 7E Learning Cycle Instructional Model. Takuana: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, dan Humaniora, 4(3), 899-911. https://doi.org/10.56113/takuana.v4i3.233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56113/takuana.v4i3.233
  23. Istunıngsıh, W., Baedhowı, B., & Sangka, K. B. (2018). The effectiveness of scientific approach using e-module based on learning cycle 7e to improve students’ learning outcome. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(3), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.449313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.449313
  24. Johnson, A. (2023). Holistic learning theory: More than a philosophy. Journal of Contemplative and Holistic Education, 1(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.25035/jche.01.02.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25035/jche.01.02.03
  25. Khairani, Z., Nasution, D., & Bukit, N. (2021). Analysis of science process skills using learning cycle 7E. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1811, No. 1, p. 012085). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012085
  26. Maxnun, L. L., Kristiani, K., & Sulistyaningrum, C. D. (2024). Development of hots-based cognitive assessment instruments: ADDIE model. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(2), 489-498. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21079
  27. Mulia, E., Zakir, S., Rinjani, C., & Annisa, S. (2021). Kajian konseptual hasil belajar siswa dalam berbagai aspek dan faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Dirasat: Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.26594/dirasat.v7i2.2648
  28. Munawarsyah, M., Fakhrurridha, H., & Muqowim, M. (2024). Character Education for Teenagers in the Era of Society 5.0 Thomas Lickona's Perspective. EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v5i2.984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v5i2.984
  29. Musfiroh, M., Suwarma, I. R., & Efendi, R. (2024). Enhancing physics learning through the 7E learning cycle model: A systematic literature review. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i3.24125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i3.24125
  30. Naade, N. B., Alamina, J. I., & Okwelle, P. C. (2018). Effect of 7E’s’s constructivist approach on students’ achievement in electromagnetic induction topic in senior secondary school in Nigeria. Journal of education, society and behavioural science, 24(3), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/JESBS/2018/39997
  31. Noreen, Z., Iqbal, M., & Hayat, K. (2024). Effect of the 7E Learning Cycle Model on Students’ Achievement in the Subject of Science at the Elementary School Level. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.315497375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.315497375
  32. Priyadi, D., & Wibowo, T. (2024). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle 7E dengan Pendekatan STEM terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik pada Materi Laju Reaksi. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 13(3), 205-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v13n3.p205-213
  33. Ragab, A., Kaid, A., & Sayed, A. K. (2024). Enhancing higher order thinking skills (hots) in education: Strategies and outcomes. TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal, 3(5), 1488-1499. https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v3i5.267
  34. Reeve, B. (2024). Item Response Theory [IRT]. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 3689-3697). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_1556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_1556
  35. Rozita, A., & Masrurotullaily. (2023). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle 7E Terhadap Pemahaman Matematis dan Keterampilan Kolaborasi Siswa. JMPM: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v8i2.3876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v8i2.3876
  36. Shah, M. A. (2022). Teachers as reflective practitioners: From individualism to Vygotskian social constructivism. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 68(3), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/ajer.v68i3.68598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/ajer.v68i3.68598
  37. Shalikhah, N. D., & Nugroho, I. (2023). Implementation of higher-order thinking skills in elementary school using learning model, media, and assessment. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3), 3978-3990. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3091
  38. Singer, F. M., & Moscovici, H. (2008). Teaching and learning cycles in a constructivist approach to instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(6), 1613-1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.12.002
  39. Timor, A. R., Ambiyar, A., Dakhi, O., Verawadina, U., & Zagoto, M. M. (2021). Effectiveness of problem-based model learning on learning outcomes and student learning motivation in basic electronic subjects. International journal of multi science, 1(10), 1-8. https://multisciencejournal.com/index.php/ijm/article/view/127
  40. Toraman, Ç., Karadağ, E., & Polat, M. (2022). Validity and reliability evidence for the scale of distance education satisfaction of medical students based on item response theory (IRT). BMC medical education, 22(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03153-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03153-9
  41. Utami, N. P., Eliza, R., & Warahma, S. (2022). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Self-Regulated Learning dengan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1025–1038. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1330
  42. Yaman, S., & Karasah, S. (2018). Effects of learning cycle models on science success: A meta-analysis. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 65-83. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=967577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.65

Copyright (c) 2026 Rosa Shafira Ulya, Erlina Erlina, Sunarto Sunarto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Beliefs Higher-Order Thinking Learning Cycle 7E Learning Outcomes Morals