Think Pair Share Learning Model Based on Differentiated Instructions: Improving Civics Learning Outcomes in Elementary School Students

Dahlia Dahlia 1 Indonesia , Abdul Wahid 1 Indonesia , Wahyullah Alannasir 1 Indonesia
1 Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Islam Makassar
Link Copied!
Published 2026-06-20
Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026) PAGES 2029-2040
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v5i3.5078
Views / Downloads 46 34

Low Civics (Pancasila and Citizenship Education/PPKn) learning outcomes in elementary schools remain a persistent challenge, often attributed to teacher-centered instruction that fails to accommodate learner diversity. This study aimed to improve PPKn learning outcomes among fifth-grade students by implementing the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model integrated with Differentiated Instruction (DI) strategies. A Classroom Action Research (CAR) design following the Kemmis and McTaggart cyclical model was employed across two intervention cycles. Thirty fifth-grade students (17 male, 13 female) at Elementary School 1 Sabaru, Indonesia, participated in the study. Data were collected through written cycle tests, structured observation sheets for teacher and student activity, and documentation analysis. Classical completion rates and descriptive statistics were used for quantitative analysis, complemented by narrative qualitative reflection. Classical mastery improved dramatically from 23.3% at baseline to 66.7% after Cycle I and 90.0% after Cycle II, surpassing the 85% success threshold. Teacher activity scores rose from 56% (low qualification) to 94% (very high qualification), while student activity scores increased from 33% (very low) to 83% (very high) across the two cycles. The integration of TPS and differentiated instruction created an inclusive, student-centered classroom climate that significantly enhanced conceptual understanding, critical thinking, collaborative skills, and learner confidence. These findings provide empirical support for adopting the TPS-DI model as a transformative pedagogical strategy in elementary Civics education.

Dahlia, D., Wahid, A., & Alannasir, W. (2026). Think Pair Share Learning Model Based on Differentiated Instructions: Improving Civics Learning Outcomes in Elementary School Students. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 5(3), 2029–2040. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i3.5078
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abendschön, S., Kleer, B. P., & Faas, T. (2022). Out-of-school learning as an effective tool of civic education in elementary school? Evidence from Germany. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 21(3), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/14788047221120682
  2. Anjani, A. U. T. (2026). Improving Pancasila Education Learning Outcomes Through The Think-Pair-Share Model in Elementary School. Teaching and General Education Studies, 2(1), 271-279. https://www.publicresearchstudy.my.id/index.php/TGES/article/view/124
  3. Atmojo, I. R. W., Adi, F. P., Saputr, D. Y., & Ardiansyah, R. (2023). The Effectiveness of the Think-Pair-Project-Share (TP2S) Learning Model in Facilitating Collaborative Skills of Prospective Teachers in Elementary Schools. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(3), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.13
  4. Boeve-de Pauw, J., Olsson, D., Berglund, T., & Gericke, N. (2022). Teachers’ ESD self-efficacy and practices: A longitudinal study on the impact of teacher professional development. Environmental education research, 28(6), 867-885. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2042206
  5. Cahyani, A. F. D., Nuriyatin, S., & Kusumawati, I. B. (2025). Analysis of TPS Learning (Think, Pair, Share) Based on Differentiation Process on Students' Numeration Abilities. Mathema: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Учредители: Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, 7(1), 198.
  6. Cooper, K. M., Schinske, J. N., & Tanner, K. D. (2021). Reconsidering the share of a think–pair–share: Emerging limitations, alternatives, and opportunities for research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), fe1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0200
  7. Dack, H., & Ann Tomlinson, C. (2025). Preparing novice teachers to differentiate instruction: Implications of a longitudinal study. Journal of Teacher Education, 76(1), 12-28. 10.1177/00224871241232419
  8. Deore, M., & Arora, S. (2022). Effective think-pair-share pedagogical strategy to improve inferential statistics concept understanding. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 25-32. https://journaleet.in/index.php/jeet/article/view/247
  9. Goyibova, N., Muslimov, N., Sabirova, G., Kadirova, N., & Samatova, B. (2025). Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learner needs. MethodsX, 14, 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103163
  10. Hasanah, A. N., Baharudin, B., & Hasnanto, A. T. (2025). Think of Pair Share Learning Model on Student Learning Activity in Science Subjects at State Elementary Madrasah. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 5(1), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4200
  11. Hasanah, E., Suyatno, S., Maryani, I., Badar, M. I. A., Fitria, Y., & Patmasari, L. (2022). Conceptual model of differentiated-instruction (DI) based on teachers’ experiences in Indonesia. Education Sciences, 12(10), 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100650
  12. Hu, L. (2024). Utilization of differentiated instruction in K-12 classrooms: a systematic literature review (2000–2022). Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(2), 507-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09931-y
  13. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research (Vol. 200). Singapore: Springer.
  14. Kim, A. (2026). Impact of systematic support in teacher education and professional development on training-teaching alignment and instructional quality. Journal for STEM Education Research, 9(1), 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-025-00154-3
  15. Kolway, N. K., Gaite, T., & Rahaor, F. M. (2026). Team Games Tournament Cooperative Learning Model on the Understanding of Pancasila Values Students at Elementary School. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 5(2), 1306-1317. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i2.4582
  16. Kristiyuana, K., Wuriningsih, F. R., Idammatussilmi, I., & Agung, A. (2025). Reforming Pedagogy in Indonesian Primary Schools: A Five-Year Systematic Review of Differentiated Instruction, Project-Based Learning, and Formative Assessment (2020–2025). Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 10(2), 1694-1705.
  17. Li, M. M., & Tu, C. C. (2024). Developing a project-based learning course model combined with the think–pair–share strategy to enhance creative thinking skills in education students. Education Sciences, 14(3), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030233
  18. Lyman, F. T., Tredway, L., & Purser, M. (2023). Think-pair-share and Thinktrix: Standard bearers of student dialogue. In Contemporary global perspectives on cooperative learning (pp. 124-143). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003268192-12
  19. Manik, K. S., & Dharma, S. (2024). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Project Citizen terhadap Peningkatan Civic Disposition Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 7 Binjai. AS-SABIQUN, 6(4), 787-809. https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/assabiqun/article/view/5121
  20. Mulyana, D. (2024). Citizenship education: Foundations of Indonesian nationalism and democracy. Journal Of Data Science, 2(01), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.58471/jds.v2i01.4314
  21. Mundelsee, L., & Jurkowski, S. (2021). Think and pair before share: Effects of collaboration on students' in-class participation. Learning and Individual Differences, 88, 102015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102015
  22. Munshi, A., Biswas, G., Baker, R., Ocumpaugh, J., Hutt, S., & Paquette, L. (2023). Analysing adaptive scaffolds that help students develop self‐regulated learning behaviours. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12761
  23. Nardo, A. (2021). Exploring a Vygotskian theory of education and its evolutionary foundations. Educational Theory, 71(3), 331-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12485
  24. Ness, I. J. (2023). Zone of proximal development. The Palgrave encyclopedia of the Possible (pp. 1781-1786). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_60
  25. Ogheneakoke, C. E., Ikenga, F. A., Misan-Ruppee, R. O., Obro, S., & Akpochafo, W. P. (2024). Effective Civic Education Pedagogy: Efficiency of Supplementary Tutoring on Students’ Learning Outcome in Civic Education. St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(2), 76-90. https://so19.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sjhs/article/view/637
  26. Pozas, M., Letzel-Alt, V., & Schwab, S. (2023). The effects of differentiated instruction on teachers’ stress and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103962
  27. Rachmadtullah, R., Prasetyo, T., Humaira, M. A., Sari, D. A., Samsudin, A., Nurtanto, M., & ZamZam, R. (2025). Professional development for Indonesian elementary school teachers: Increased competency and sustainable teacher development programs. F1000Research, 13, 1375. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.156946.3
  28. Rigopouli, K., Kotsifakos, D., & Psaromiligkos, Y. (2025). Vygotsky’s creativity options and ideas in 21st-century technology-enhanced learning design. Education Sciences, 15(2), 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020257
  29. Sari, C. I., Fitriyah, C. Z., & Puspitaningrum, D. A. (2025). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Type Think Pair Share on Social Attitudes of Elementary School Students. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian, 11(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v11n1.p1-11
  30. Schneid, S. D., Armour, C., & Brandl, K. (2025). Beyond right or wrong: How partial credit scoring on multiple‐choice questions improves student performance and assessment perceptions. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70127
  31. Setambah, M. A. B., Appalanaidu, S. R., Zaini, S. H., Othman, M. S., Ridwan, A., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2025). Differentiated instruction: A systematic literature review on implementation guidelines in mathematics education. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 12(3), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2025.03.011
  32. Situmeang, T. A., Sintania, L. S., Lase, M., & Yunita, S. (2023). Pendidikan Pancasila dan kewarganegaraan sebagai optimalisasi dalam meningkatkan sikap toleransi siswa. Journal on Education, 5(4), 16622-16629.
  33. Slavin, R. E. (2016). Instruction based on cooperative learning. 2016). Handbook of research on learning and instruction. Taylor & Francis.
  34. Tasos, T. (2024). Social constructionism: Critical analysis from a Vygotskian perspective. Rethinking Marxism, 36(2), 195-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2024.2328667
  35. Tupiño, R. M. L., Carcausto-Calla, W., Nakiche, K. C., Gamarra, S. K. S., & Shigetomi, E. E. G. (2023). Differentiated methodological strategies for inclusive education in basic education: Scoping review. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(6), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0147
  36. Unger, S., & Lecher, A. (2024). How Assessment Choice Affects Student Perception and Performance. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 7(1), 78-95. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1436886
  37. Utami, N. P. A., & Sanjaya, D. B. (2025). Civic Education as a Development of Character Education for Elementary School Students. Indonesian Journal of Instruction, 6(1), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.23887/iji.v6i1.95784
  38. White, G., Dong, D., Campbell, D. E., & Lee, C. D. (2023). The future of civic education: Implications for research, policy, and practice. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 705(1), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162231193538
  39. Yang, X. (2023). A historical review of collaborative learning and cooperative learning. TechTrends, 67(4), 718-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9
  40. Zhan, Z., He, W., Yi, X., & Ma, S. (2022). Effect of unplugged programming teaching aids on children’s computational thinking and classroom interaction: With respect to Piaget’s four stages theory. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(5), 1277-1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211057143

Copyright (c) 2026 Dahlia Dahlia, Abdul Wahid, Wahyullah Alannasir

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 51 52 53 54 55 56 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Civic Education Classroom Action Research Cooperative Learning Differentiated Instruction Think Pair Share