Collaborative Learning in Primary Schools: A Systematic Review of Development, Strategies, and Effectiveness

Authors

  • Amri Saputra Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University of Yogyakarta
  • Defriyadi Defriyadi Raden Intan State Islamic University of Lampung
  • Ahmad Saipul Anwar Jurai Siwo State Islamic University of Lampung
  • Dini Cahyati Tanggamus College of Education of Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v5i2.5664

Keywords:

Collaborative Learning, Cooperative Learning, Primary Education, Learning Effectiveness

Abstract

Collaborative learning has established itself as one of the most significant pedagogical approaches in 21st-century primary education. This study presents a systematic review of the development, implementation strategies, and effectiveness of collaborative learning in primary schools, drawing on analysis of 198 Scopus-indexed articles published between 2010 and 2026. Rather than mapping epistemological trends, this review adopts a practice-oriented perspective, examining how collaborative learning works, which strategies have proven effective, under what conditions effectiveness is optimal, and what fundamental implementation challenges exist in real classrooms. Five developmental phases are identified, characterized by successive shifts in focus: from dialogic technology (2010–2014), structuring of cooperative models (2015–2019), redefinition of collaboration in the pandemic era (2020–2022), integration of social-emotional learning and artificial intelligence (2023–2024), and an orientation toward inclusion and educational equity (2025–2026). Strategies such as Jigsaw, STAD, peer tutoring, and collaborative project-based learning consistently demonstrate positive effects on academic achievement (Hedges' g = 0.71–0.79), social-emotional skills, learning motivation, and the formation of long-term social preferences. Critically, this effectiveness is not automatic and is highly dependent on implementation quality, teacher facilitation competence, task design that ensures positive interdependence, and group composition that accounts for cognitive capacity. The most significant challenges identified include the reduction of collaborative learning to procedural group work, weak group process regulation, and unanticipated cognitive heterogeneity. In the Indonesian context, collaborative learning carries strong cultural and policy resonance with the value of gotong royong and the spirit of Kurikulum Merdeka, yet the gap between policy rhetoric and meaningful classroom practice still requires serious attention.

References

Akkuş, A., & Doymuş, K. (2022). Effect of subject jigsaw and reading writing presentation techniques on academic achievement of 6th grade. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.133

Andreatti, G., & Morselli, D. (2026). Cooperative or game-based learning? Fostering financial literacy for sustainable citizenship through two contrasting implementations in primary education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 18(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031545

Barnes-Story, A. E., Robinette, J. J., Wawire, B. A., & Jere, B. (2025). Teaching and managing large classes: A global scoping review of methods with primary and secondary learners. International Journal of Educational Development, 119, Article 103450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103450

Buchs, C., Dumesnil, A., Chanal, J., & Butera, F. (2021). Dual effects of partner’s competence: Resource interdependence in cooperative learning at elementary school. Education Sciences, 11(5), Article 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050210

Charong, M., & Haruthaithanasan, T. (2025). Implementing Japanese lesson study in a Thai private school: How to build a professional learning community for mathematics teachers. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 46(2), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2025.46.2.30

Chen, C.-M., & Huang, M.-Y. (2024). Enhancing programming learning performance through a Jigsaw collaborative learning method in a metaverse virtual space. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00495-2

Du, X., Chen, C., & Lin, H. (2022). The impact of working memory capacity on collaborative learning in elementary school students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1027523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027523

Erbil, D. G., & Kocabaş, A. (2020). Flipping the 4th grade social studies course in a cooperative way: Effects on academic achievement and motivation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, Article 100878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100878

Fernández-Río, J., & Suarez, C. (2016). Feasibility and students’ preliminary views on parkour in a group of primary school children. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2014.946008

Flores, M., Ribosa, J., & Duran, D. (2024). How does peer tutoring contribute to the development of reading comprehension? Evidence from ten years of practice. Revista de Psicodidactica, 29(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2024.04.004

Gunnars, F. (2025). Collaborative dynamics and psychophysiological variances in teaching methods measured through teacher-students compliance: A cross-classified multilevel analysis. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(2), 861–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09832-y

Hardianti, N., Sudarnika, E., & Lukman, D. W. (2025). Implementation of collaborative learning to improve knowledge about rabies among students at elementary school in Dompu, West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciences, 14(2), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.47278/journal.ijab/2025.004

Hogenkamp, L., Van Dijk, A. M., & Eysink, T. H. S. (2021). Analyzing socially shared regulation of learning during cooperative learning and the role of equal contribution: A grounded theory approach. Education Sciences, 11(9), Article 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090512

Huang, P.-S., Chiu, P.-S., Huang, Y.-M., Zhong, H.-X., & Lai, C.-F. (2020). Cooperative mobile learning for the investigation of natural science courses in elementary schools. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(16), Article 6606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166606

İlhan, A. (2021). The impact of game-based, modeling, and collaborative learning methods on the achievements, motivations, and visual mathematical literacy perceptions. SAGE Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211003567

Ito, T., Kubota, K., & Ohtake, F. (2022). Long-term consequences of the hidden curriculum on social preferences. Japanese Economic Review, 73(2), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42973-019-00033-8

Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D. (2021). The benefits of cooperative learning of language in different subject lessons as seen by primary school pupils: The case of one Lithuanian city school. Education Research International, 2021, Article 6441222. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6441222

Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D., Žemgulienė, A., & Sakadolskis, E. (2021). Cooperative learning issues in elementary education: A Lithuanian case study. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(1), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.1.445.468

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

Karmina, S., Dyson, B., & Setyowati, L. (2024). Teachers’ perspectives on implementing cooperative learning to promote social and emotional learning. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 43(2), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i2.68447

Lakkala, M., & Ilomäki, L. (2015). A case study of developing ICT-supported pedagogy through a collegial practice transfer process. Computers and Education, 90, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.001

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389

León-García, L.-F., Mendo-Lázaro, S., López-Ramos, V.-M., & León-del-Barco, B. (2026). Cooperative classrooms and prosocial behavior in primary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1725692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1725692

Liu, C., Cui, Z., & Weng, X. (2026). Effects of a self-regulated cooperative programming approach on elementary students’ programming knowledge, metacognitive awareness, and self-efficacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 42(1), Article e70167. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70167

Lu, S.-J., Lin, Y.-C., Tan, K. H., & Liu, Y.-C. (2022). Revolutionizing elementary disaster prevention education and training via augmented reality-enhanced collaborative learning. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211067345

Lupión-Cobos, T., Crespo-Gómez, J. I., & García-Ruiz, C. (2023). Challenges and opportunities to teaching inquiry approaches by STE(A)M projects in the primary education classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(3), 454–469. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.454

Minelli-de-Oliveira, J., Camacho, M., & Gisbert, M. (2014). Exploring student and teacher perception of e-textbooks in a primary school. Comunicar, 21(42), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-08

Montanero, M., & Franco, L. I. (2024). Can they really help each other? Analysing peer support in spontaneous tutoring situations among young children. Estudios Pedagogicos, 50(1), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052024000100191

Najoan, R. A. O., Kumolontang, D. F., Ester, K., Tarusu, D. T., Setiawan, B., & Iasha, V. (2024). Impact of the team-assisted individualization learning model on mathematical problem-solving, communication, and self-regulated learning. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 7(2), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v7i2.2645

Naparan, G. B., & Alinsug, V. G. (2021). Classroom strategies of multigrade teachers. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 3(1), Article 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100109

Paavilainen, T., López-Pernas, S., Väisänen, S., Kontkanen, S., & Hirsto, L. (2026). Implementing learning design with learning analytics to scaffold the regulation of collaboration in primary education. Smart Learning Environments, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-026-00453-1

Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

Park, J. Y., & Nuntrakune, T. (2013). A conceptual framework for the cultural integration of cooperative learning: A Thai primary mathematics education perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.933a

Pifarré, M., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2011). Wiki-supported collaborative learning in primary education: How a dialogic space is created for thinking together. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9116-x

Rivera-Pérez, S., Fernandez-Rio, J., & Gallego, D. I. (2021). Effects of an 8-week cooperative learning intervention on physical education students’ task and self-approach goals, and emotional intelligence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010061

Saif, A. F. M. S., Mahayuddin, Z. R., & Shapi’i, A. (2021). Augmented reality based adaptive and collaborative learning methods for improved primary education towards Fourth Industrial Revolution (IR 4.0). International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(6), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120672

Saputra, A., Cahyati, D., & Suparti, S. B. (2026). Quo vadis collaborative learning in primary schools: A systematic review of trends, epistemological shifts, and research gaps. Pedagogik Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 9(2), 654–676. https://doi.org/10.24256/pijies.v9i2.10933

Saputra, A., Hijriyah, U., Romlah, L. S., Susanti, A., Sunarto, & Shabira, Q. (2025). Trends and developments in gamification for science education: A bibliometric review from 2019 to 2023. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.10169

Jeliseh, M. T., Gilakjani, A. P., & Xodabande, I. (2026). Comparing the impact of individual and collaborative games on young language learners' spelling skills in English. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102390

Talkhan, E., Alhubaidah, S., Muthanna, A., & Qadhi, S. (2025). The effect of cooperative learning toward mathematics achievement of primary students: A systematic review using meta-analysis. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 12, Article 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102247

Titikusumawati, E., Sa’dijah, C., As’ari, A. R., & Susanto, H. (2020). The effectiveness of the integration of open-ended and collaborative (OE-C) learning strategies in reducing gaps of elementary school students’ creative thinking skills. Elementary Education Online, 19(1), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.653653

Toledo, S. V., Latorre-Cosculluela, C., González-Yubero, S., & Mairal-Llebot, M. (2025). Perceptions of students toward learning-oriented assessment: The potential of peer assessment. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.2.16

van de Oudeweetering, K., & Voogt, J. (2018). Teachers’ conceptualization and enactment of twenty-first century competences: Exploring dimensions for new curricula. Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1369136

Vega, N., Stanfield, J., & Mitra, S. (2020). Investigating the impact of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) to help improve reading comprehension in low performing urban elementary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1571–1584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10023-3

Veldman, M. A., Doolaard, S., Bosker, R. J., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2025). Changes in patterns of peer relationships in primary education classroom networks through cooperative learning. School Psychology, 40(3), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000617

Veldman, M. A., Hingstman, M., Doolaard, S., Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2020). Promoting students’ social behavior in primary education through Success for All lessons. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, Article 100934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100934

Veldman, M. A., Van Kuijk, M. F., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2020). The proof of the pudding is in the eating? Implementation of cooperative learning: Differences in teachers’ attitudes and beliefs. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 26(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1740197

Vicente, F. R., Llinares, A. Z., & Sánchez, N. M. (2020). “Sustainable City”: A STEAM project using robotics to bring the city of the future to primary education students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229696

Viilo, M., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2018). Long-term teacher orchestration of technology-mediated collaborative inquiry. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258665

Vu, K., Dao, V., DeJaeghere, J., & Glewwe, P. (2024). Collaborative learning in the Vietnam Escuela Nueva Model and students’ learning behaviors: A mixed methods longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Development, 106, Article 103017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103017

Warwick, P., Mercer, N., Kershner, R., & Staarman, J. K. (2010). In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil’s learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard. Computers and Education, 55(1), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.001

Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Burnheimer, E., Johnson, N. C., Franke, M. L., & Zimmerman, J. (2021). Is there a right way? Productive patterns of interaction during collaborative problem solving. Education Sciences, 11(5), Article 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050214

Wyman, P. J., & Watson, S. B. (2020). Academic achievement with cooperative learning using homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. School Science and Mathematics, 120(6), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12427

Zhao, A., Lurvink, A.-F., Klune, C., Hinks, J., Beoku-Betts, I., Choragudi, U., & Iyer, G. (2026). Assessing different implementation modalities of an EdTech intervention for lower-primary learners: A difference-in-difference study in Sierra Leone. British Journal of Educational Technology, 57(3), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70056

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Saputra, A., Defriyadi, D., Anwar, A. S., & Cahyati, D. (2026). Collaborative Learning in Primary Schools: A Systematic Review of Development, Strategies, and Effectiveness. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 5(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v5i2.5664

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.