Collaborative Learning in Primary Schools: A Systematic Review of Development, Strategies, and Effectiveness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v5i2.5664Keywords:
Collaborative Learning, Cooperative Learning, Primary Education, Learning EffectivenessAbstract
Collaborative learning has established itself as one of the most significant pedagogical approaches in 21st-century primary education. This study presents a systematic review of the development, implementation strategies, and effectiveness of collaborative learning in primary schools, drawing on analysis of 198 Scopus-indexed articles published between 2010 and 2026. Rather than mapping epistemological trends, this review adopts a practice-oriented perspective, examining how collaborative learning works, which strategies have proven effective, under what conditions effectiveness is optimal, and what fundamental implementation challenges exist in real classrooms. Five developmental phases are identified, characterized by successive shifts in focus: from dialogic technology (2010–2014), structuring of cooperative models (2015–2019), redefinition of collaboration in the pandemic era (2020–2022), integration of social-emotional learning and artificial intelligence (2023–2024), and an orientation toward inclusion and educational equity (2025–2026). Strategies such as Jigsaw, STAD, peer tutoring, and collaborative project-based learning consistently demonstrate positive effects on academic achievement (Hedges' g = 0.71–0.79), social-emotional skills, learning motivation, and the formation of long-term social preferences. Critically, this effectiveness is not automatic and is highly dependent on implementation quality, teacher facilitation competence, task design that ensures positive interdependence, and group composition that accounts for cognitive capacity. The most significant challenges identified include the reduction of collaborative learning to procedural group work, weak group process regulation, and unanticipated cognitive heterogeneity. In the Indonesian context, collaborative learning carries strong cultural and policy resonance with the value of gotong royong and the spirit of Kurikulum Merdeka, yet the gap between policy rhetoric and meaningful classroom practice still requires serious attention.
References
Akkuş, A., & Doymuş, K. (2022). Effect of subject jigsaw and reading writing presentation techniques on academic achievement of 6th grade. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.133
Andreatti, G., & Morselli, D. (2026). Cooperative or game-based learning? Fostering financial literacy for sustainable citizenship through two contrasting implementations in primary education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 18(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031545
Barnes-Story, A. E., Robinette, J. J., Wawire, B. A., & Jere, B. (2025). Teaching and managing large classes: A global scoping review of methods with primary and secondary learners. International Journal of Educational Development, 119, Article 103450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103450
Buchs, C., Dumesnil, A., Chanal, J., & Butera, F. (2021). Dual effects of partner’s competence: Resource interdependence in cooperative learning at elementary school. Education Sciences, 11(5), Article 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050210
Charong, M., & Haruthaithanasan, T. (2025). Implementing Japanese lesson study in a Thai private school: How to build a professional learning community for mathematics teachers. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 46(2), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2025.46.2.30
Chen, C.-M., & Huang, M.-Y. (2024). Enhancing programming learning performance through a Jigsaw collaborative learning method in a metaverse virtual space. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00495-2
Du, X., Chen, C., & Lin, H. (2022). The impact of working memory capacity on collaborative learning in elementary school students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1027523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027523
Erbil, D. G., & Kocabaş, A. (2020). Flipping the 4th grade social studies course in a cooperative way: Effects on academic achievement and motivation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, Article 100878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100878
Fernández-Río, J., & Suarez, C. (2016). Feasibility and students’ preliminary views on parkour in a group of primary school children. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2014.946008
Flores, M., Ribosa, J., & Duran, D. (2024). How does peer tutoring contribute to the development of reading comprehension? Evidence from ten years of practice. Revista de Psicodidactica, 29(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2024.04.004
Gunnars, F. (2025). Collaborative dynamics and psychophysiological variances in teaching methods measured through teacher-students compliance: A cross-classified multilevel analysis. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(2), 861–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09832-y
Hardianti, N., Sudarnika, E., & Lukman, D. W. (2025). Implementation of collaborative learning to improve knowledge about rabies among students at elementary school in Dompu, West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciences, 14(2), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.47278/journal.ijab/2025.004
Hogenkamp, L., Van Dijk, A. M., & Eysink, T. H. S. (2021). Analyzing socially shared regulation of learning during cooperative learning and the role of equal contribution: A grounded theory approach. Education Sciences, 11(9), Article 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090512
Huang, P.-S., Chiu, P.-S., Huang, Y.-M., Zhong, H.-X., & Lai, C.-F. (2020). Cooperative mobile learning for the investigation of natural science courses in elementary schools. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(16), Article 6606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166606
İlhan, A. (2021). The impact of game-based, modeling, and collaborative learning methods on the achievements, motivations, and visual mathematical literacy perceptions. SAGE Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211003567
Ito, T., Kubota, K., & Ohtake, F. (2022). Long-term consequences of the hidden curriculum on social preferences. Japanese Economic Review, 73(2), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42973-019-00033-8
Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D. (2021). The benefits of cooperative learning of language in different subject lessons as seen by primary school pupils: The case of one Lithuanian city school. Education Research International, 2021, Article 6441222. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6441222
Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D., Žemgulienė, A., & Sakadolskis, E. (2021). Cooperative learning issues in elementary education: A Lithuanian case study. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(1), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.1.445.468
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Karmina, S., Dyson, B., & Setyowati, L. (2024). Teachers’ perspectives on implementing cooperative learning to promote social and emotional learning. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 43(2), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i2.68447
Lakkala, M., & Ilomäki, L. (2015). A case study of developing ICT-supported pedagogy through a collegial practice transfer process. Computers and Education, 90, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.001
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
León-García, L.-F., Mendo-Lázaro, S., López-Ramos, V.-M., & León-del-Barco, B. (2026). Cooperative classrooms and prosocial behavior in primary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1725692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1725692
Liu, C., Cui, Z., & Weng, X. (2026). Effects of a self-regulated cooperative programming approach on elementary students’ programming knowledge, metacognitive awareness, and self-efficacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 42(1), Article e70167. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70167
Lu, S.-J., Lin, Y.-C., Tan, K. H., & Liu, Y.-C. (2022). Revolutionizing elementary disaster prevention education and training via augmented reality-enhanced collaborative learning. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211067345
Lupión-Cobos, T., Crespo-Gómez, J. I., & García-Ruiz, C. (2023). Challenges and opportunities to teaching inquiry approaches by STE(A)M projects in the primary education classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(3), 454–469. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.454
Minelli-de-Oliveira, J., Camacho, M., & Gisbert, M. (2014). Exploring student and teacher perception of e-textbooks in a primary school. Comunicar, 21(42), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-08
Montanero, M., & Franco, L. I. (2024). Can they really help each other? Analysing peer support in spontaneous tutoring situations among young children. Estudios Pedagogicos, 50(1), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052024000100191
Najoan, R. A. O., Kumolontang, D. F., Ester, K., Tarusu, D. T., Setiawan, B., & Iasha, V. (2024). Impact of the team-assisted individualization learning model on mathematical problem-solving, communication, and self-regulated learning. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 7(2), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v7i2.2645
Naparan, G. B., & Alinsug, V. G. (2021). Classroom strategies of multigrade teachers. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 3(1), Article 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100109
Paavilainen, T., López-Pernas, S., Väisänen, S., Kontkanen, S., & Hirsto, L. (2026). Implementing learning design with learning analytics to scaffold the regulation of collaboration in primary education. Smart Learning Environments, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-026-00453-1
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Park, J. Y., & Nuntrakune, T. (2013). A conceptual framework for the cultural integration of cooperative learning: A Thai primary mathematics education perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.933a
Pifarré, M., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2011). Wiki-supported collaborative learning in primary education: How a dialogic space is created for thinking together. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9116-x
Rivera-Pérez, S., Fernandez-Rio, J., & Gallego, D. I. (2021). Effects of an 8-week cooperative learning intervention on physical education students’ task and self-approach goals, and emotional intelligence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010061
Saif, A. F. M. S., Mahayuddin, Z. R., & Shapi’i, A. (2021). Augmented reality based adaptive and collaborative learning methods for improved primary education towards Fourth Industrial Revolution (IR 4.0). International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(6), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120672
Saputra, A., Cahyati, D., & Suparti, S. B. (2026). Quo vadis collaborative learning in primary schools: A systematic review of trends, epistemological shifts, and research gaps. Pedagogik Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 9(2), 654–676. https://doi.org/10.24256/pijies.v9i2.10933
Saputra, A., Hijriyah, U., Romlah, L. S., Susanti, A., Sunarto, & Shabira, Q. (2025). Trends and developments in gamification for science education: A bibliometric review from 2019 to 2023. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.10169
Jeliseh, M. T., Gilakjani, A. P., & Xodabande, I. (2026). Comparing the impact of individual and collaborative games on young language learners' spelling skills in English. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102390
Talkhan, E., Alhubaidah, S., Muthanna, A., & Qadhi, S. (2025). The effect of cooperative learning toward mathematics achievement of primary students: A systematic review using meta-analysis. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 12, Article 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102247
Titikusumawati, E., Sa’dijah, C., As’ari, A. R., & Susanto, H. (2020). The effectiveness of the integration of open-ended and collaborative (OE-C) learning strategies in reducing gaps of elementary school students’ creative thinking skills. Elementary Education Online, 19(1), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.653653
Toledo, S. V., Latorre-Cosculluela, C., González-Yubero, S., & Mairal-Llebot, M. (2025). Perceptions of students toward learning-oriented assessment: The potential of peer assessment. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.2.16
van de Oudeweetering, K., & Voogt, J. (2018). Teachers’ conceptualization and enactment of twenty-first century competences: Exploring dimensions for new curricula. Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1369136
Vega, N., Stanfield, J., & Mitra, S. (2020). Investigating the impact of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) to help improve reading comprehension in low performing urban elementary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1571–1584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10023-3
Veldman, M. A., Doolaard, S., Bosker, R. J., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2025). Changes in patterns of peer relationships in primary education classroom networks through cooperative learning. School Psychology, 40(3), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000617
Veldman, M. A., Hingstman, M., Doolaard, S., Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2020). Promoting students’ social behavior in primary education through Success for All lessons. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, Article 100934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100934
Veldman, M. A., Van Kuijk, M. F., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2020). The proof of the pudding is in the eating? Implementation of cooperative learning: Differences in teachers’ attitudes and beliefs. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 26(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1740197
Vicente, F. R., Llinares, A. Z., & Sánchez, N. M. (2020). “Sustainable City”: A STEAM project using robotics to bring the city of the future to primary education students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229696
Viilo, M., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2018). Long-term teacher orchestration of technology-mediated collaborative inquiry. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258665
Vu, K., Dao, V., DeJaeghere, J., & Glewwe, P. (2024). Collaborative learning in the Vietnam Escuela Nueva Model and students’ learning behaviors: A mixed methods longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Development, 106, Article 103017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103017
Warwick, P., Mercer, N., Kershner, R., & Staarman, J. K. (2010). In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil’s learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard. Computers and Education, 55(1), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.001
Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Burnheimer, E., Johnson, N. C., Franke, M. L., & Zimmerman, J. (2021). Is there a right way? Productive patterns of interaction during collaborative problem solving. Education Sciences, 11(5), Article 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050214
Wyman, P. J., & Watson, S. B. (2020). Academic achievement with cooperative learning using homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. School Science and Mathematics, 120(6), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12427
Zhao, A., Lurvink, A.-F., Klune, C., Hinks, J., Beoku-Betts, I., Choragudi, U., & Iyer, G. (2026). Assessing different implementation modalities of an EdTech intervention for lower-primary learners: A difference-in-difference study in Sierra Leone. British Journal of Educational Technology, 57(3), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70056
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amri Saputra, Defriyadi Defriyadi, Ahmad Saipul Anwar, Dini Cahyati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article manuscript, the author agrees to all policies set forth by the journal and publisher.
The author declares that:
- They have been authorized by their co-authors to enter into this agreement.
- The work described has not been officially published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a lecture, review, thesis, or preprint journal.
- The work is not currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- Its publication has been approved by all authors and by the responsible authorities—either implicitly or explicitly—of the institution where the work was conducted.
- They have obtained the right to reproduce any material that has been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors publishing in Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA 4.0) License, which allows others to share the work with acknowledgment of the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional non-exclusive contractual agreements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and increased citation of the published work.

3.png)

3.png)